From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add openttd Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:30:21 +0300 Message-ID: <877fg3z0te.fsf@gmail.com> References: <570C2836.7030100@fripost.org> <20160412010929.GA22784@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aptiL-00066N-Rx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 04:30:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aptiH-0006Ah-Sp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 04:30:25 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::242]:35042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aptiH-0006Ab-FB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 04:30:21 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id o124so1449226lfb.2 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 01:30:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160412010929.GA22784@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:09:29 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari (2016-04-12 04:09 +0300) wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:41:58AM +0200, Albin wrote: >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add openttd. > > Can you add the "changelog" to the commit message? See commit 6dc609985 > for a recent example of the desired format. Leo means the commit message should look like this: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- gnu: Add openttd. * gnu/packages/games.scm (openttd): New variable. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> + (source >> + (origin (method url-fetch) >> + ;; The official download URL is >> + ;; http://binaries.openttd.org/releases/1.6.0/openttd-1.6.0-source.tar.xz >> + ;; but it doesn't work with `guix download`. However, it >> + ;; redirects to the one below (and the SHA sums match). > > Is it a problem with `guix download` or with the remote server? Even if > we don't fix the issue, it would be nice to say what the problem is in > this comment. It is not only 'guix download', the same happens with 'guix build'. I've reported it at . Thanks for this useful comment!. -- Alex