From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Connman
Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 15:41:04 +0200
Message-ID: <877ff8bp1r.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160420224145.GA8585@debian-netbook> <87fuu99wgq.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160505063137.GA31911@debian-netbook>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48068)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ayJWw-0007Y0-7b
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2016 09:41:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ayJWj-0007LS-Nk
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2016 09:41:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160505063137.GA31911@debian-netbook> (Efraim Flashner's
	message of "Thu, 5 May 2016 09:31:37 +0300")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:04:21AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:

[...]

>> > +    (license gpl2)))
>>=20
>> v2-only?
>
> I thought this was strange and I took another look at the website and
> the code and it turns out it is gpl2 only.

Just to be clear, what matters to determine whether it=E2=80=99s v2-only is
whether license headers in the source files carry the =E2=80=9Cor any later
version=E2=80=9D wording or not.

>> > +(define* (connman-service #:key (connman connman))
>> > +  "Return a service that runs Connman, a network connection manager. =
 This
>>=20
>> s/Connman/@uref{http://=E2=80=A6, Connman}/
>
> @uref or @url? wicd uses @url

They are synonymous.

>> > +service adds the @var{connman} package to the global profile, providi=
ng
>> > +several the @command{connmanctl} command to interact with the daemon =
and
>> > +configure networking."
>>=20
>> Could you add this documentation to guix.texi?
>
> Much less scary than I thought it was going to be

:-)

>> How does Connman compare to Wicd, and to NetworkManager?
>
> Its hard for me to say, Debian is stuck with 1.22 from forever ago, but
> from playing around it seems almost as featureful as Network Manager
> while being out of the way like wicd, and has better integration into
> enlightenment than either one.

OK!

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.