From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: Python 3.5 start of update Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:03:41 -0500 Message-ID: <877fay8ibm.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <3746864.VkbyMe6eV1@myrada> <20160304031506.GC30676@jasmine> <1457160701.30082.22.camel@ghic.org> <1457419942.28654.19.camel@ghic.org> <87mvmetukz.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87ziqekz75.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2hhtlex.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20160821175851.GA10659@jasmine> <20160830014810.GA12517@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bejdu-00032X-9p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:04:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bejdp-0005pZ-Ht for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:03:58 -0400 In-reply-to: <20160830014810.GA12517@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 01:58:51PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> I picked this up. I've attached two patches. They upgrade python-3.4 to >> 3.4.5, and then upgrade python-3 to 3.5.2 while preserving a python-3.4. >> These are the latest releases in their respective series. >> >> I had to split part of the python-fix-tests.patch into 3.4 and 3.5 >> specific patches, since those packages' codebases have diverged. >> >> python@3.4.5 and python@3.5.2 both build on master and wip-python. >> python-setuptools builds with python@3.5.2 on master. >> >> I'd like to put these on core-updates. The wip-python branch will take a >> while to get ready. I found this saga about what Nix had to do to >> upgrade setuptools: >> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/12552 > > I went ahead and pushed to core-updates, bringing the branch to > 72df66806. Horray! Thanks for pushing it the rest of the way. :)