From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add mtd-utils.
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:53:46 +0300
Message-ID: <877fau4u0l.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <20160829232414.2538-1-dannym@scratchpost.org>
	<87eg56r85q.fsf@gmail.com> <20160830103925.6cc58bc2@scratchpost.org>
	<87oa48k63k.fsf@gnu.org> <20160831233942.32dbd77d@scratchpost.org>
	<8760qfq0m0.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45680)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1bfjIT-0006Mt-Mz
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 03:53:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1bfjIP-0001qf-J8
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 03:53:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8760qfq0m0.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 01 Sep 2016 14:13:27 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2016-09-01 15:13 +0300) wrote:

> Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:
>
>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:59:11 +0200
>> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote:
>>
>>> Are there GPLv2 license headers that lack the =E2=80=9Cor any later ver=
sion=E2=80=9D
>>> wording, or anything that explicitly says =E2=80=9Cversion 2 only=E2=80=
=9D?  If not,
>>> it=E2=80=99s v2-or-later.
>
> [...]
>
>> ./mkfs.ubifs/crc16.h: ' * Implements the standard CRC-16: * Width 16 *
>> Poly 0x8005 ( x^16 + x^15 + x^2 + 1 ) * Init 0 * * Copyright ( c )
>> 2005 Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com> * * This code was taken from
>> the linux kernel. The license is GPL Version 2.  '
>
> OK, GPLv2-only!

Wait, why?  There are files that have a full license headers with "or
any later version", for example "docfdisk.c", "flash_erase.c" and
others.  That's why I thought both gpl2 and gpl2+ should be listed.

--=20
Alex