From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodoros Foradis Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add FPGA Tools Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:53:24 +0300 Message-ID: <877f9zc62m.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <20160818151833.29540-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <87a8evcuia.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160926093721.03844342@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60905) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boTYp-0004Dk-1c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 06:54:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boTYk-0002k1-Ms for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 06:54:58 -0400 Received: from smtp24.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.58]:51539 helo=smtp9.openmailbox.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boTYk-0002jB-H5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 06:54:54 -0400 In-reply-to: <20160926093721.03844342@scratchpost.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Guix-devel Hi, > I posted a patch "gnu: Move libusb from inputs to propagated-inputs" back in August which would fix that (by fixing libftdi). Adding libusb here is not the right fix. Are there any issues blocking that patch? Seems straightforward to me. -- Theodoros Foradis