From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add scheme-bytestructures
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:27:54 +0200
Message-ID: <877f95ivf9.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAL7_Mo9DMh9y--KOMMtNVqo=y_-JSKMaeHru2Mp-Omv-JXa8dg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87fuo4hz3c.fsf@openmailbox.org> <8760p0gcer.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL7_Mo-Z5_uKeWbr-OUhoGmLYTzEVWSkX55ik+WOgGBBwaJUtA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41897)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bwVN4-0006Oa-8i
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:28:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bwVMy-0002Qt-Tk
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:28:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAL7_Mo-Z5_uKeWbr-OUhoGmLYTzEVWSkX55ik+WOgGBBwaJUtA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Amirouche Boubekki's message of "Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:14:22 +0000")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com> skribis:

> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:46 PM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrot=
e:
>
>> Hi Amirouche,
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>> >> +            (scm-files (string-split
>> "bytestructures/guile/explicit-endianness.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/guile/numeric-metadata.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/guile/ffi.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/guile/vector.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/guile/union.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/guile/numeric-all.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/guile/utils.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/guile/pointer.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/guile/base.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/guile/numeric.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/guile/struct.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/guile/bitfields.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/r6/bytevectors.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/body/base.syntactic.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/body/explicit-endianness.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/body/vector.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/body/union.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/body/utils.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/body/base.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/body/numeric.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/body/struct.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/body/bitfields.scm
>> >> +bytestructures/guile.scm"
>>
>> Please let=E2=80=99s not list all the files.  :-)  Could it instead use
>> something like (find-files "bytestructures" "\\.scm$")?
>>
>
> The above is a subset of all files. Do you prefer to use `find-files` and
> exclude some files?

Whichever is the most concise and most maintainable approach (I suspect
it=E2=80=99s =E2=80=98find-files=E2=80=99 + exclude specific files.)

Ludo=E2=80=99.