From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: Shutdown of googlecode end of the year - we have affected packages! Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:15:31 +0000 Message-ID: <877f6gcep8.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87a8dep57h.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20161106083018.GC31483@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <87a8d9zbtm.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87inrx77zm.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87a8byo5vb.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87wpf2jlhg.fsf@elephly.net> <87a8bxy4g6.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57559) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNLNd-0002uv-5D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 10:15:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNLNZ-0003zg-Po for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 10:15:32 -0500 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:56771) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNLNZ-0003y8-I9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 10:15:29 -0500 Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNLNW-0002Or-Bg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:15:26 +0100 Received: from tor01.zencurity.dk ([185.129.62.62] helo=localhost) by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1cNLNF-0006V9-Us for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:15:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a8bxy4g6.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org I am trying to add mp4v2, and while it's functional, I'm in contact with upstream to figure out where (if at all) it moved. So far the (anonymous) opinion, which I do share, is that the situation is chaotic with so many forks out there. Depending on how the discussion(s) end, I will suggest (or will not) suggest doing a fork on the side of the GNU project or at our side (of GNUnet eV). There has been no official statement so far which I could forward or quote, so this opinion is only in here because it's a view I share and had before I started reaching out to upstream. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 PGP keys and more: https://n0is.noblogs.org/ http://ng0.chaosnet.org