From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?Let=E2=80=99s?= freeze and build =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99!?= Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 23:23:49 +0200 Message-ID: <877f32wlju.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87mvdpw3b3.fsf@gnu.org> <20170320184145.GA5087@jasmine> <87a884td23.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87k273g3qz.fsf@gnu.org> <87tw66j0oe.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87fuhq4xz0.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cumyY-0007Ar-US for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 17:23:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cumyV-0002g5-QZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 17:23:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fuhq4xz0.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> "vim-full" also has a failing test, but is arguably less important. >> There are "relink" warnings during the test phase, like this: >> >> Relink `/gnu/store/vis7x2j2lsmwbl5m5w794c23ysqah8xh-libpng-1.6.28/lib/li= bpng16.so.16' with `/gnu/store/rmjlycdgiq8pfy5hfi42qhw3k7p6kdav-glibc-2.25/= lib/libpthread.so.0' for IFUNC symbol `longjmp' >> >> ...but I'm not sure if it's actually related. > > Hmm, I=E2=80=99ve also seen this when running Lilypond! I thought it was= my > fault. I don=E2=80=99t know what this means. Do we need to rebuild libp= ng? I don't know either, but this topic was discussed recently at [0] and is apparently a glibc regression [1]. We should probably open a bug for tracking it, since there is likely more software affected in Guix. [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-03/msg00626.html [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D21041 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAljha+UACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPq7Xwf5AVIIltwOnoUJpxkICDNwd4TvkIYp9d+loZ4X1T1loTRQcb04yzVZWX3v 3na/sDxbOviP4fckUgAq4n+yaoWtbqUdGG2G3aCz8fMkdNo7VdwU9b68oX966GFv ApU1POrkPxRorJXIDEgjdtu8WqGq6DM/hc+G0PRS4PNglEvUYhyj/3aL9o/f4Cmk l0YZT5aB8C4bORauEvMFWPi2tY85+51xCN/mHPn1KBXY4Kurbdm1LR51QMAt3VUS WaGnyiIA99l773OyjeF27tA06Riih8BzNF0XSRKE1s8PeHXN4YVfYhrAa93mTjK7 N+Qa8USNW5zo/W/+hL5bqgKYOK1e1Q== =rW+L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--