From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 09:59:53 +0200 Message-ID: <877f0d65qe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <57bc6255-c3a1-61e2-fee4-5b6f523a9885@zoho.com> <87injztuax.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58451) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLPiE-0000wE-S2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 04:01:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLPiA-0004zS-Hr for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 04:01:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45791) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLPiA-0004zN-ED for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 04:01:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLPiA-0001pV-7L for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 04:01:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (sirgazil@zoho.com's message of "Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:36:25 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: sirgazil Cc: 26006@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, sirgazil skribis: > On 13/06/17 17:08, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: [...] >> I found it a little bit confusing that talks and papers now appear as if >> they were blog posts, but after all it=E2=80=99s probably better to have= it this >> way, especially since tags allow people to find them more easily I guess. >> >> The packages pages look better than what we have (minus the loss of the >> JS code to display the build status ;-)). > > About the JS, I couldn't figured out exactly how it works, so that I > could adapt it to the new page structure. Additionally, there is the > problem that the JS looks for packages in the DOM by id, and package ids > are not unique, which confuses me. Also, using duplicated id attributes > is non-valid HTML. The current code that generates the package pages intends to compute unique anchor names for each package (see =E2=80=98packages->anchors=E2=80= =99), and I think it=E2=80=99s those IDs that the JS code uses, isn=E2=80=99t it? >> I think there are a few little changes that were made in the current >> site that were lost in the process. For example, on the front page, we >> now have =E2=80=9CDOWNLOAD v0.13.0=E2=80=9D instead of =E2=80=9CTEST v0.= 13.0=E2=80=9D. I=E2=80=99ve also seen >> that links to the package definitions at git.sv.gnu.org from the package >> pages no longer include the commit. Anyway, these are really tiny >> issues but we should pay attention to them when we migrate. > > I updated the download button. > > As for the commit in the links, I tried to add it, but couldn't. I > implemented this website using the Guix API as a user (installing guix > with guix), but it seems that the code to generate the commit part in > the links requires that the guix in the GUILE_LOAD_PATH be a git > repository, right? Since it uses "git describe" on "guix/config.scm". Indeed, good point. I guess we could have a fallback case for when =E2=80= =98git describe=E2=80=99 fails. On a more practical level, what would you like the workflow to be like from there on? I would prefer hosting the source on gnu.org rather than {bitbucket,gitlab,github}.com and I would also prefer Git over Mercurial, but I don=E2=80=99t want to be a hindrance so I=E2=80=99m open to discussions. :-) Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.