From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:05:06 +0200 Message-ID: <877f0cjtul.fsf@gnu.org> References: <57bc6255-c3a1-61e2-fee4-5b6f523a9885@zoho.com> <87injztuax.fsf@gnu.org> <877f0d65qe.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50593) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLlKY-0005L0-QL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 03:06:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLlKU-0002lT-R3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 03:06:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLlKU-0002lP-MY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 03:06:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLlKU-00011R-H1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 03:06:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (sirgazil@zoho.com's message of "Thu, 15 Jun 2017 21:52:41 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: sirgazil Cc: 26006@debbugs.gnu.org Howdy! sirgazil skribis: > On 15/06/17 02:59, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: [...] >> On a more practical level, what would you like the workflow to be like >> from there on? I would prefer hosting the source on gnu.org rather than >> {bitbucket,gitlab,github}.com and I would also prefer Git over >> Mercurial, but I don=E2=80=99t want to be a hindrance so I=E2=80=99m ope= n to >> discussions. :-) > > No worries. The idea was to move the useful parts to guix-artwork on > gnu.org. > > To be honest, when I started this version of the website I was just > motivated on implementing the designs and exploring a way to organize > modules in a haunt website so that data, builders and templates were > separated. But I was not very interested in dealing with git workflows, > and strict commit messages. Sorry about that :) No problem, this is perfectly understandable (also I=E2=80=99m fine with re= laxed conventions on guix-artwork.git). > So, what do we do? Create a branch on guix-artwork and drop these files > there to complete what is missing? I don't know... Yes we could do that. Should we investigate the missing bits first? I haven=E2=80=99t taken the time to do it yet, sorry about that. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.