From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0@n0.is Subject: Re: Licensing question about Pale Moon Browser binary distribution Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 14:40:43 +0000 Message-ID: <877ersyg0k.fsf@abyayala.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <878tc96k6t.fsf@abyayala.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <5A771999.1050509@palemoon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiLTY-0003uf-FC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 09:41:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiLTU-0004Qk-Ct for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 09:41:00 -0500 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:49660) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiLTU-0004Pq-5J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 09:40:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5A771999.1050509@palemoon.org> (moonchild@palemoon.org's message of "Sun, 4 Feb 2018 15:32:57 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Moonchild Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, On Sun, 04 Feb 2018, Moonchild wrote: > Hi! > > You've read the exception point correctly: > > Using New Moon (=unofficial) branding, you are allowed to do whatever > you wish with your distribution, including reconfiguration, different > home page, etc. Go right ahead! > If you make source code changes, you should also supply your modified > source code to stay within the requirements of the MPL source code license. > > Moonchild. Alright then. I should've asked this question earlier. Better late than never. Thanks for your reply! > On 04/02/2018 12:58, ng0@n0.is wrote: > >>>From re-reading item 12: >> >>> Unofficial branding ("New Moon") as supplied in the source code >>> may be used for unendorsed binaries at all times. Thusly >>> branded binaries with the New Moon logo and product name are >>> not subject to the endorsement and exception rules as set out >>> in previous points of this license and may be freely >>> distributed in altered or unaltered form, subject to the >>> Mozilla Public License as regards source code changes and >>> availability. This permission does, however, not include any >>> rights or license to the Pale Moon name and logo that may still >>> be present in the resulting unofficially branded binaries. >> >> in the above mentioned policy I understand that we will be >> allowed to distribute the resulting binaries. Is my understanding >> of your policy exception correct or did I miss anything? >> >> Regards, >> ng0 >> > > -- ng0 :: https://ea.n0.is A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 :: https://ea.n0.is/keys/