From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60035) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejSjX-0005fn-7G for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:38:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejSjS-0005rh-6Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:38:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejSjS-0005rc-3F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:38:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ejSjR-0005x9-Jd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:38:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#30328] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-browse-at-remote-gnu. Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: <20180202214457.14147-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <87k1vq5ec3.fsf@gnu.org> <871shynjzi.fsf@gmail.com> <874lmt17jx.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 19:37:36 +0300 In-Reply-To: <874lmt17jx.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 07 Feb 2018 10:18:58 +0100") Message-ID: <877eroycvj.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 30328@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> > What about simply adding the patch to =E2=80=98emacs-browse-at-rem= ote=E2=80=99 if >> > it=E2=80=99s committed upstream way? >> >> I'm sorry, what do you mean by =E2=80=9Ccommitted upstream way=E2=80= =9D? > > I mean that the patch for Savannah support is already in the repository > of =E2=80=98browse-at-remote=E2=80=99, isn=E2=80=99t it? Technically it is there. > Which is to say that the next version of =E2=80=98browse-at-remote=E2= =80=99 will > have that functionality. > > I don=E2=80=99t know, won=E2=80=99t the next =E2=80=98browse-at-remote= =E2=80=99 include it? I hope so, but I cannot answer for them (upstream). =20 > The output of =E2=80=98guix lint=E2=80=99 seems to be messy, too. Do you mean =E2=80=9Cfilled=E2=80=9D? Sorry for that. So, what will our strategy be? Stay close to upstream by making a new package with patch or patching the original package? Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc+OyAXw1EaDPCmAPckbhHGm3lWkFAlp7K1AACgkQckbhHGm3 lWk/6xAAzPf4gA22Uj79PcF5koa2ZojSV/dQ8fdapiRR6CVWETPK93GG9fng9DBx IHHuYvraNNRV8oKdMsSyAJyHNqmxGFM0fqcecmK9cLuvTuHsJYAiQV6wCpVixPH0 Cb/rOCtms2tz/IxNDZM6qCjcE2ytLYho4Qcrf4h4O0Af8e9tCZGtMIDFlV5SfR0D nmBjZj/bBpTvIloWP9SQeoCS/DCwhezPa1VwbCQ75lyzAamD8vtloc2Jo2dUo5nc pHG/cFlnzBQB0oHf71giltm6cwCwI2o7SuFMm762MCftv9uivpbHG9NFFqXMba36 2+iV8w2d8Ck/fW6vbmzB+tsXbu6haEqFAXQz5uKsh7Ak5e8zYNLa5qo+OjiiBvT9 uaegu7VAttcjqP8yNmAJ8tPdMJwVk5F3QdgHpo4SeEMppOmyIQeXAnvtxijuHQl9 a11Vq7q9eSkEui+0+DUCaze8znSYVGUVoq7soJW8pMCUT1Gl6Xxzq1kjva9xp2OI LgvngXcNwNVTVl8Dw4x3rGRSs035Z/QCLHaB0dxAdifxQULu4Is4gq8tZC1OAhP9 mzGk/8dGcfqN7856KvOaNxCITYbIfIW4VvrgXgttwJkZ4fc/qz3IJF92tBYeWkQ9 AWdWBXAAq1WLCMKgzxU/VHQLMlVZtP7oxRnwKBXNd2JCL6tYmwk= =HuLS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--