From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: Guix on aarch64 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:56:20 -0400 Message-ID: <877ekbsccb.fsf@netris.org> References: <87mutm72n7.fsf@jnanam.net> <878t565k85.fsf@lassieur.org> <87k1oq6wgf.fsf@jnanam.net> <87bm9tbrx9.fsf@netris.org> <87zhxcoy0p.fsf@gnu.org> <87efelw1fr.fsf@netris.org> <20180826185922.GB18912@jasmine.lan> <87tvng1bib.fsf@elephly.net> <87bm9ntyjh.fsf@netris.org> <87zhx7bohb.fsf@elephly.net> <87o9dnsep0.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51360) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuPWK-0001Cj-1T for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:58:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuPWG-0003Ho-S7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:57:59 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:48006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuPWG-0003HX-M9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:57:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87o9dnsep0.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:05:31 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Benjamin Slade Hi again, > Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> I think you are overreacting and I really don=E2=80=99t think the sarcas= tic >> response is justified. This kind of communication is very demotivating >> to me. > > Believe it or not, I wasn't conscious of the fact that I was being > sarcastic or hostile. I should clarify. I wasn't trying to be sarcastic when I wrote this: > Perhaps the idea is to use the fact that Aarch64 is unusable to > motivate people to work on Cuirass? because, as I said, I think it's sometimes justified to block a temporary workaround to motivate implementation of a proper fix. My suggestion that perhaps we should take Hydra offline was an attempt to argue against the idea by reductio ad absurdum, but I can see how it came off as sarcastic and hostile. Anyway, I guess I'm under too much stress and hostility is leaking out. Sorry. I should probably take a break from communicating for a while. Regards, Mark