From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gG0UH-0005BQ-JO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 07:41:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gG0UE-0006qH-Eq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 07:41:09 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gG0UE-0006q9-B8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 07:41:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gG0UE-00085j-0e for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 07:41:06 -0400 Subject: [bug#33066] [PATCHv3] gnu: rust: workaround rust 1.25-27 reproducibility issues Resent-Message-ID: From: Nikolai Merinov References: <877eihu5hx.fsf@member.fsf.org> <875zy1u5ec.fsf@member.fsf.org> <20181017131406.01c3b011@scratchpost.org> <87y3atsouq.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87sh11slfg.fsf_-_@member.fsf.org> <87mur7sqrf.fsf@member.fsf.org> <20181025074422.08edec2a@scratchpost.org> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:40:34 +0500 In-Reply-To: <20181025074422.08edec2a@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Thu, 25 Oct 2018 07:44:22 +0200") Message-ID: <877ei5lyvh.fsf@member.fsf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 33066@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Danny, I'm sad to hear it. All this issues looks for me as LLVM reproducibility issue and there was some reproducibility-related changes after LLVM 6.0.1 release, e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D48369 https://reviews.llvm.org/D48392 and others. Note: I checked previously mentioned changes individually and it did not solved reproducibility issue for rust. Unfortunately I'll be not able to return to this reproducibility investigation for a while. So currently I can suggest to merge changes without rust 1.29 to have reproducible chain from 1.23 to 1.28. Regards, Nikolai Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi Nikolai, > > I've got a cargo reproducibility failure in rust 1.29.2. Attached is diffoscope output :( > > Seems a little similar to what we had before (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50556 ).