From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#33896: libblockdev inputs are not used correctly Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 18:55:52 +0100 Message-ID: <877efj2dlj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20181228143255.78bf15b1@scratchpost.org> <20181229185036.GV2581@macbook41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggsout.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55777 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfqB5-0006pQ-KO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 12:56:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfqB0-0007Zk-KM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 12:56:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44289) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfqB0-0007ZX-Fv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 12:56:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gfqB0-0005xx-DH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 12:56:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20181229185036.GV2581@macbook41> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Sat, 29 Dec 2018 20:50:36 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 33896@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 02:32:55PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: >> Currently, libblockdev has inputs which aren't used. >>=20 >> These SHOULD be used, but the source files are not patched >> so the executables in the inputs are not found or used. >>=20 >> Example: >>=20 >> * libblockdev depends on dosfstools because src/plugins/fs/vfat.c would = use >> "mkfs.vfat" etc, but src/plugins/fs/vfat.c is not patched to actually re= fer >> to the inputs. >>=20 >> This problem is valid for everything in src/plugins/fs . >>=20 >> Do we proceed to patch it to use the inputs or do we move dosfstools etc >> to propagated-inputs ? >>=20 >> I'd suggest the former. > > Similar to the enlightenment package getting more 'substitute*'s to > improve functionality, I agree that patching libblockdev to actually > find all the inputs/executables is preferable. I agree; using =E2=80=98substitute*=E2=80=99 is more appropriate than propa= gation here. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.