From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#35550: Installer: wpa_supplicant fails to start Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 23:26:52 +0200 Message-ID: <877eb7grfn.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87sgtv8hcz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfit-0003rj-Mm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:28:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfis-0005i3-Lm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:28:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfis-0005hv-IZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:28:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfis-0005dv-7C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:28:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfic-0003ks-JM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:27:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfia-0005ZI-NM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:27:46 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21345) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfiY-0005V1-P1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:27:43 -0400 In-reply-to: <87sgtv8hcz.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: sirgazil@zoho.com, 35550@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Ricardo and sirgazil reported on IRC that the =E2=80=98wpa-supplicant=E2= =80=99 would > (sometimes?) fail to start for the in the installation image on their > laptop. What I observed was that the wpa-supplicant *service* would not start and starting it manually would fail because a wpa_supplicant *process* would already be running. Upon killing the stray process the service could be started. --=20 Ricardo