From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: Fixing ant-bootstrap / jamvm segfault (i686)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:59:02 +0200
Message-ID: <877e5pftdl.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87v9tsped0.fsf@elephly.net>
 <CAE4v=ph7dsZsz1P_B+S93=hZLvLLFa1JOGFuAM0U-b3kXdVJvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <87blv6gqjt.fsf@elephly.net>
 <CAE4v=pi_0NErAX=Ez=d7fU3PZmw3Ee0qhJJWB+OhJVaOtJ=_cg@mail.gmail.com>
 <87a7aqgorh.fsf@elephly.net>
 <CAE4v=pjiwG8+D0EJo8G3aSSudzHnW-bhXzoSq5v6fbxU4qO7-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE4v=phTyycYvCwvQdwgjnREEwB9szbMzL_7N0eEMc2q+V8C5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42099)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1iF1pD-00051z-BU
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:59:16 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1iF1pC-0001or-4j
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:59:15 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAE4v=phTyycYvCwvQdwgjnREEwB9szbMzL_7N0eEMc2q+V8C5Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, julien lepiller <roptat@lepiller.eu>


Hi G=C3=A1bor,

> The attached patch also works for me. Can you check?

I just noticed that this is not enough for me to build
classpath-0.99-1.e7c13ee0c.  ant-bootstrap builds fine but Classpath
fails.  (This is with --system=3Di686-linux.)

I haven=E2=80=99t tried to build all the way to the final JDK with my previ=
ous
patch yet.

--
Ricardo