From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Presentation BlueHats (french workshop) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:07:48 +0100 Message-ID: <877e1snzkb.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1irqpL-0002y1-Kt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:07:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:11:28 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: zimoun Cc: Guix Devel Hi zimoun, zimoun skribis: > Attached 2 patches for the repo 'maintenance'. > 1. Fixing broken links in talks/ > 2. My slides These had fallen through the holiday cracks, but I=E2=80=99ve finally pushe= d it! > This talk was in French with a slot of 5-7 minutes, questions included. = It was > taken in a full day satellite to Paris Open Source Summit. The initiativ= e was > lead by Bastien Guerry from https://www.etalab.gouv.fr/. More informatio= n of > the programme [[https://forum.etalab.gouv.fr/t/journee-bluehats-lors-du-p= aris-open-source-summit-le-11-decembre-2019/4614][here]]. > > The slot was very short and the audience very heterogeneous; especially a= bout > the day-to-day concerns. As an engineer working in an institute doing re= search > in biology, I have tried to explain what is the Reproducible Science chal= lenge > in the modern age of data. > > In short, today a scientific result is an experiment producing data *and*= a > numerical processing. From what I am seeing, the experimental part is mo= re or > less well described, or let say that people in labs are aware of its impo= rtance > because they have already several decades (even more) of collective learn= ing. > > However, not enough people take care about the numerical processing. Mai= nly, in > my opinion, because we are living a scientific paradigm shift. From what= I am > seeing, more than often, it is not understood that more scientific value = is in > the numerical process than really in the data itself (or how they are pro= duced). > Even if I am fully biased because computing is my job and I understand no= thing > about labs. It=E2=80=99s nice you were able to talk at POSS. I suppose the audience wa= s not necessarily familiar with reproducible science, right? > To guarantee Reproducible Science in the modern age of data, we need to > guarantee several items, especially: > 1. Open Articles > 2. Open Data > 3. Open Source > 4. Controlled computing environment (open, too) > Today, initiatives have been starting, to name some, about 1. > [[http://rescience.github.io/][ReScience journal]] > or french specific [[https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/][HAL]], 2. > [[https://zenodo.org/][Zenodo]] and 3. > [[https://www.softwareheritage.org/][Software Heritage]]. Yup! Not a fan of =E2=80=9Copen=E2=80=9D which I find confusing here, but = definitely a fan of putting all this in perspective! Thanks for sharing! Ludo=E2=80=99.