bug#40525: inferior process on core-updates crashes: mmap(PROT_NONE) failed

[Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1560 bytes --]


Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Glad you manage to get more info.
>>
>> Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:
>>
>>> Following up on this, I've built Guile on core-updates with libgc@7
>>> rather than libgc@8 (which is what's used above), and I can't reproduce
>>> the issue. So, I'm getting more certain that this is a regression which
>>> the libgc upgrade has led to.
>>
>> Bah.  :-/
>>
>> We noticed similar issues with libgc@8 earlier but it seemed to be
>> fixed:
>>
>>   https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36812
>>
>>> Would it be feasible to keep guile, or at least the guile Guix uses with
>>> libgc@7 for now?
>>
>> Yes, we can define a Guile variant in (gnu packages guile) and have
>> (guix self) refer to it.
>
> I've sent a patch which I think does this now [1]. Assuming I've done
> the right thing, is this something that can be merged in to core-updates
> Marius?
>
> 1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40684
>
> I've tested the patch by running:
>
>   ./pre-inst-env guile build-aux/compile-as-derivation.scm "$PWD"
>
> Then taking the Guix I get, and trying the script to reproduce the issue
> through the guix repl, and it seems to work.

I've merged the fix [1] in now, and it looks to have worked [2].

1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40684
2: https://guix-patches-data.cbaines.net/revision/cef392f3936922b7b0b74bd59be67e660c10db67

Thanks for your help in resolving this Ludo!

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 962 bytes --]