From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id COSNHL4YNmAufwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:13:34 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id AAxoGL4YNmArCAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:13:34 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A27E71625A for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:13:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42194 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqEe-0006kq-OF for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:13:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqEA-0006jZ-BZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:13:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqE9-0004L4-OM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:13:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqE9-0001WP-Ki for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:13:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46266] [PATCH] gnu: Update bitcoin-core to 0.21.0 Resent-From: Christopher Baines Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46266 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: ZmnSCPxj Cc: 46266@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46266-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46266.16141579235754 (code B ref 46266); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:13:01 +0000 Received: (at 46266) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 09:12:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33285 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqDC-0001Uk-Pd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:12:02 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:38082) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqDB-0001UL-4B for 46266@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:12:01 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:8ac0:b4c7:f5c8:7caa]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F334427BC4A; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:11:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from capella (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2f3fcf63; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:11:59 +0000 (UTC) References: User-agent: mu4e 1.4.14; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:11:57 +0000 Message-ID: <877dmxltia.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.47 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A27E71625A X-Spam-Score: -4.47 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Fw0zpCskcDli --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi ZmnSCPxj, Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. guix-patches--- via writes: > In addition to updating, I made as well, separate `bitcoin-core-0.20` > and `bitcoin-core-0.21` packages. Due to RPC changes, it is possible > that other programs compatible with older `bitcoin-core` version is > not compatible with newer version. Thus, an `operating-system` > declaration, may need to pin a specific major version. I think it's OK to keep older versions if that's important, but it would be good to specifically note why specific older versions are useful to keep. I'm saying that because it's useful to know when an older version can be removed. So, for 0.20 are there incompatibilities that you're aware of? The second thing is, I wouldn't immediately jump to the (make-... pattern, and I would instead use package inheritance. See the ruby packages for example [1]. 1: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/ruby.scm#n95 Package inheritance makes it simpler to make changes to individual versions, and avoids the complexity of introducing a procedure. Does that all make sense? Thanks, Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmA2GF1fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XehDxAAlHqYGsQWJ+wmRf3s2yXOoyTqdeXg+DU7 ATCptfaae7hJXwuq5/RvWsG5coG11mZIU/Ir4qY4/41ogv6v/ZLF4N2yg0L6X/hU 2ZY4t2D85buvs8bGi5FWzT3HqelW61qdFrNugLPCxlNEFw0M71Xu88btjkHRvShO CJDrrXq6q5Samth1kSXe15A4bqW+x2zzdmVtjfQIfFn6t3AyaxB36tKJe72LM4bY Wvq72Ax0tPy97bnzI3OqtazBz8fOlxMQiFb2sDm5ttjoyqQv7UHIpo76txh0jQ5y Iavderb0rkbAe4esLyvIgvD7395FbkJ5WYySElJORK1E7j9A/jAY3W3oWON37+zY OK4SwD0vHvdBsyYXW8zHM6+bf3M30jm4Csnd/n9ggYjC3Mhc6gJ/jkR6CMETSS5U 6d4DwPYnAmsdR7lG/6hj/k1jUWIms6RYkRSFlINI/+RWg2ySnOfV7p7GNwrQ9jep uRZE12wV7O1d34K2lo5nkaMspkaDiIRI1/4LobxsRj/Dszytl9zZC3GEQc8EfNpo z1H5bFnT/BmdWYx/Hs2fy1bQHxJxDw8z+tPK1MUF2WMaCWmPoxgUJrsQYaX+/jkL dYJw7WqGeZaqZbS1iEpEY/JR7i3JKGU78kMpO4DMM4VTPYtG+M2GwqAOxaxYiy9D 0HmoaeH8iGI= =mhCG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--