From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id ILq3HSLLYmAs6AAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 08:54:26 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id sP6iFyLLYmCweAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:54:26 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2065E154A2 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 08:54:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50498 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lR8Gf-0007j8-Ac for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 02:54:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lR8GE-0007iz-WE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 02:53:59 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]:55979) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lR8GD-0008Ti-1b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 02:53:58 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:8ac0:b4c7:f5c8:7caa]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49B6127BC63; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 07:53:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from capella (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 56fbf7c3; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:53:54 +0000 (UTC) References: <0323e477b9226759445ad7c58bad134fcff4bc40.camel@zaclys.net> <878s67dmwn.fsf@netris.org> <878s669zqf.fsf@cbaines.net> <87eefx36ni.fsf@netris.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Baines To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: GNOME 40 work should be done on Savannah (was: Re: GNOME 40) In-reply-to: <87eefx36ni.fsf@netris.org> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 07:53:51 +0100 Message-ID: <877dlp169s.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27; envelope-from=mail@cbaines.net; helo=mira.cbaines.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1617087266; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=7s0IPnNNtf6R1YJpaturL8Dx6jn54jbKLapnYD2ezSg=; b=n5f65lcwgn9N4ifgQ5WJiMccFmhwTfCpkvzThLKUzsbPzPhFI+g++jRccBLc2vDBrR/MBj nkjALCitPHlOz6/VktC/K5vWdETdq5LjHFXgB/8sLpZoUcxIAl8yWuWkiV4ujxWveSA1D5 /ze5aCzZbYE/aWa95f9I8q8CEh4I5UnsZjoGBIzrdZu2YDSiEVLvgBv7/z30GfXBW/jr5G SMnDjSGd0/sFu48cbbocmcweCEanFAVKLlKrTbbADqbmiFFbMLmza0hZeAcc49ejttC/Ow QulgumbB/V4HKUavsDQ1QpTfPnWPA7NHHwx1SVC13Baza6ocFx7X9pEJdrHHgA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1617087266; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=siuePJqOwxiOEPkGkDt7P3YYkD4zvJx2mw0YvFQ4XBNonQt9qdobMDSDtcLmma4MZ0reKT aoqG+QTJcMe3/FQIqWrGL2XYvBXqoRYljkRxsy2AJTmFjOuuBBb4BXUdmnH+cJrm02Fexx haJ1PNY2PvFCRr5Co2t83lJl/s3o2D3zuL4qyxcnAlUDUSsLGT3OQnSBdM3LsS2nPL4ojE L0Ql5rgc24VYjhz9itQtSZX9n7GLp99+SebF6LKMNQHb/Q5TI+mTAM6OVxOLYGjCoH1SgX 0tNVOjbWTWYeymwfx8P7t4E8cZ8xhK9lQnkY4YpwJpQvke5kzsD9Xc+31DCfsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.52 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 2065E154A2 X-Spam-Score: -4.52 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: FOou72Fjskaj --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark H Weaver writes: > Christopher Baines writes: > >> Mark H Weaver writes: >>> How is it more flexible than a "wip-*" branch on Savannah? >> >> I wouldn't use quite the same words as L=C3=A9o, but from my perspective, >> controlling access to particular branches (master, staging, >> core-updates, ...) on Savannah is a good thing, as it reduces risk. > > I don't see much risk here. You're talking about a 'wip' branch that > almost no one will be using anyway. We already trust all Guix > committers with our master branch, which directly and immediately > affects any Guix user who updates their system at the right time. No, I was talking about particular branches, master, staging, core-updates, ... and controlling access to those more sensitive branches. I mention this as context for discussing acesss control to wip-* branches, because currently as I understand it, if someone wants access to work on a specific wip- branch, the only way to do that is grant access to all branches in all repositories in the Guix Savannah project. ... > I'd strongly prefer for this work to be done on Savannah. If this were > a fringe branch of marginal interest, it might make sense to have it > elsewhere, but this is core Guix desktop work that's likely to be of > interest to a large segment (plausibly a majority) of our community. > IMO, it belongs in our official git repository. I'm not commenting on this Gnome 40 related work, as I'm not really involved, but I do think there's some potential for improvement regarding how wip- branches are handled. Having them on Savannah is great as you say, but that makes these branches more difficult to use for people who don't have commit access. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmBiyv9fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XfEUw/9EGgPcL4YN6NUcPVlkSZoWvDSElw+C6YT zzf18CICSJoeGu/YiEtkT3M0/jWp0ka0dUiwDN/QXNkfb1clHtrOw2RRLVwcNQNT rYwjMM2N5rtcYetpgNaCn+TJzIT/AWZIeVNIgp1RkJwwjb/jqWwDD/jFTPuFhFuV wMtDzudBo4ftzyTErzBPxYvBA797oyKePPKHzDHnk+yDoJGry8ClNdS/aQusqI+E bHgmhbrbCtJ1xxmKhP279cZnwtpoLvunE4ufCQpIPXFo9oWmSisAD9TqiZSvD2j4 VrhVPd/QFCJR9yrJ8XiiNDhMOxV53DMG0485NyaNx2nkjUSQsTkKD1io4HcNi2AZ Tn1sSAEkr3HLO00Hb/fbQ0r7HVhQFSWFEiHHQRJgnX2sTxJd2W7k/sQZJgWT6FnW apdCkt7HFM4F3OXYzYeEikcxosWRSy28x2ZnvJ3z/bjF9MzvWEJW8oFj4ymUF3Cx Az62dpwZS07DKbCbnuUhEtEdsMIj9xc1Oc/m6LzWTUz+L5/G6ccgwgiMlbXiW3rV cGmzlvYmbkZeZ5h8KQH87q1ZUUFfDjbqFopCngGApf3QsrKBi9YL/P3NXlBPDsbB p+A5mThiCvS8Yv3CmxFt/gEn6iDksCFFEYqHoY1VWr2mhq3aUb1R4/uHyu27fTl3 XX+FZm3bhQQ= =ywvW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--