From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id OI5GKvE9wmE1WAEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:49:53 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id CNABJvE9wmGhXgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 20:49:53 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 575F6ECB1 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:49:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42808 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzm52-0005tg-Cd for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 15:49:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzm46-0005rl-4d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 15:48:54 -0500 Received: from [2600:3c01:e000:267:0:a171:de7:c] (port=49400 helo=cascadia.aikidev.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzm44-0004ti-H7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 15:48:53 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:21:21:21:0:100e]) (Authenticated sender: vagrant@cascadia.debian.net) by cascadia.aikidev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F37411A982; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:48:48 -0800 (PST) From: Vagrant Cascadian To: Maxim Cournoyer , zimoun Subject: Re: Release v1.4 (or 2.0): process and schedule ? In-Reply-To: <87v8zk2fe3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86ilvq5kmf.fsf@gmail.com> <86ilvnh7kt.fsf@gmail.com> <87v8zk2fe3.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:48:35 -0800 Message-ID: <877dbxznto.fsf@ponder> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2600:3c01:e000:267:0:a171:de7:c (failed) Received-SPF: none client-ip=2600:3c01:e000:267:0:a171:de7:c; envelope-from=vagrant@debian.org; helo=cascadia.aikidev.net X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1640119793; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=iJjieu7ZshPqhwio+7jStgD7VKZRAzHa92cZrqZc0k4=; b=qZ6+d2nCnUztr3ucebPTDVu6E6OF9MgHHOq3RbW+l5kmTvT+dxqGVGT1r0WL6FMZ48HnhZ ZXEoV7xubsjtVBjyOuBRm4Q1aAiSu9cXOUhuwfOagG3ipHZO3fw1WNUucpnLBgM+WCYGtF ji/7uzNfoZCEDjtY91Mygq3aQR60TjNyv6ErWM4ZwHTAZRcBdCIhe/7AKsOGR8LAJL4aYO WsSzA3TdfbyF2fsfeqFnPJwN/J999t5CbL0DXd/acIktV8HzIA+syAYR3ucbUbgqCjiUSl aAA/2ELmAhaSSiXg4gVtsBLlX5iy7BvhS7XsAjIHAnxYx0nkdnuBhe1PZ0UKQA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1640119793; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=IUwNHRdlKtSCEn+JGsHW6aOvZorf0Nje07I3SRfJGpXcWT+vKk5IDDG1mzz/YKrauCQ303 6VdJQdIFuBY52cjh0FFXFHALAu3o0KmwJrt27nI7vcxSbFdCsOwXAPv3kacBMj7Urz0lEe axibNNX0+Pnj3AOOsvBD+54tJobSVWUde27j4+DDEK4nQy3+wYKZeisFlANT9zfvjbLEZ2 9Y/8vJR44b4y0b1ou5CVnhXWp1Ssz5EOF+s9RgMgG8Liv5MRBbmPBKZjbadkkMOTcqruXx PuKK/fEgBqbpkyT75XCNstvFBQAu5BliYkwTy7A+HJ4uzT7KNOTmCISR9bn0DQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.43 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 575F6ECB1 X-Spam-Score: -4.43 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: bPVM6dqLrN54 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On 2021-12-19, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > zimoun writes: >> Now core-updates-frozen is merged. Now The Big Change [1 ]is done. Do >> we go for v1.4 or v2.0? > > As I've mentioned previously, I'd go for a 1.4.0 release, since overall > we've refined and improved (greatly!) what we already had rather than > introduced something revolutionary. I'd keep a 2.0.0 for when we have > p2p distributed substitutes, a custom graphical tool and/or integration > with the 'Software' application in GNOME, this kind of big user-facing > changes. But that's just my personal opinion :-). If the majority > feels a 2.0.0 is more suitable, I won't mind. > >> In both case, what is the target for a release date? I propose January >> 31rst. WDYT? > > I'd like to fix #52051 before issuing the first release candidate (RC). > Assuming this can be made before the end of January with the first RC > coming out around New Year, and that the kind of collaboration I've seen > in the last weeks continues at the same intensity, this seems > achievable. Would it be appropriate to fix the ~700 low-hanbging fruit issues that are identified by: guix lint --checkers=description,synopsis It is not the most exciting work technically, but it is relatively easy, and low risk, maybe the worst it does is put a bit more work on translators... Maybe there are also other low hanging fruit guix lint knows about that would not be particularly disruptive? It is not particularly urgent for a release, per se, but I suspect it will just grow and grow without some sort of cycle to address such trivial issues... and doing such cleanup before making a release would aim for a higher standard of craftspersonship. :) I can maybe try to help stir up a coordinated effort, if folks are interested in pursuing this line of thinking! live well, vagrant --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCYcI9qQAKCRDcUY/If5cW qkwdAQC2a+oBFwoASths9tUgUhhfJiomoKbxOw8/S7fjwc6O7AD/dogx1kpvG4st DSQjx0G/kR9CL/HbHkO7a526V+9f0QY= =BCCM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--