From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id sLP4Kh5Bc2TIKQAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 28 May 2023 13:55:10 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id wFPQKh5Bc2S2agEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 28 May 2023 13:55:10 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EFD516AB9 for ; Sun, 28 May 2023 13:55:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3EzI-00032j-B2; Sun, 28 May 2023 07:55:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3EzG-00032L-Fl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 07:55:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3EzG-0005iJ-7r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 07:55:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3EzG-0007hL-44 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 07:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#63530: Missing library in package procps Resent-From: Jelle Licht Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 11:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63530 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Gabriel Wicki , 63530@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 63530-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63530.168527488529561 (code B ref 63530); Sun, 28 May 2023 11:55:02 +0000 Received: (at 63530) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2023 11:54:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53397 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Eyy-0007gi-Bm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 07:54:45 -0400 Received: from mail1.fsfe.org ([217.69.89.151]:40916) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Eyh-0007gI-1u for 63530@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 07:54:42 -0400 From: Jelle Licht DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fsfe.org; s=2021100501; t=1685274865; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qj6OiSQk90fXA260q+fJJLAR552XZRkjH3MEeAOeWZk=; b=OrGryvhSFo9gqww4hUx5wGK+5Vg4gIFJilbmrotbldexJXBAXQ+TT2HDyFMIogaPE2+PNw hCMH8UXPUDzsQT7mG6N3KItx8dQ628hvtHXJ5/vKrFIPvRycfcUBApRiRvkJlAb5pV7bG7 svY5/+43LgEvPSOc4i40PqeBw3Ow5Ws= In-Reply-To: <87mt243dlp.fsf@erlikon.ch> References: <87wn192qh8.fsf@erlikon.ch> <87o7mlkyq8.fsf@riseup.net> <87mt243dlp.fsf@erlikon.ch> Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 13:54:24 +0200 Message-ID: <877cssd633.fsf@fsfe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1685274910; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jJtKx/7emMRYpXW2zDEj2oO5ACbDgi4UzCdOEyQdW0De1PComW56obvUbk/uZ0CLmzex+/ TjGDlqD97DAs8q1OWbq8dapgIZ/B8v4FWN8/UX81KM/0egtR5qn4hVVJw8e/L0oYn1Adsn rjlp2fTd+MfhumstPjRZOTi+utuYTByIeMOkKn8E2j0mvP7A32gEBcF8Zs98Jc+9apdIiq p284+/jDWTQyDHl8Vji/LgFr2YorztqkXQxGzAXsdIvCpgy3lYkZUlSjs3UwQPp2De2+j7 U18yGEEuNmT5j6qxpduA7JFop+8ZSFkPfOdj2E9+Pf1K48A9BcNmzuwPqQxzhA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=fsfe.org header.s=2021100501 header.b=OrGryvhS; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=fsfe.org (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1685274910; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=qj6OiSQk90fXA260q+fJJLAR552XZRkjH3MEeAOeWZk=; b=p58hxKx5CFBQrfoqkX+IZZj9GZBloA+QKKhf3eQReNaajXOIjmNMx8maMeXSIMkt2xiSpY DwUC5LCawFvzFIYVJEFWQGflDVnS9P/vX7kEHLxspcCUcD5njcCIy1VrAMHaZcr7r29TzS duy3p949uUqO5scYCZqi5ctIfB+k+OLFDYjAoZphsE65lW9eozoLVTxzW5JuR1HIs5K3gC 9XN9reC2tMi+0GtKkqFsfhj5pBJFJ0mQj1aq/sbnA3KaZWmRl3QiVes6jura4vfBZGWRwx mj+X5I0Ld80THZJSpdYMC+qwyJ81L7diDEahnC5m6BiLQeu6DLfpq9ZcvRsSHg== X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=fsfe.org header.s=2021100501 header.b=OrGryvhS; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=fsfe.org (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 5.85 X-Spam-Score: 5.85 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4EFD516AB9 X-TUID: YJI1fM29JhnF Hello, Gabriel Wicki writes: > A little more hacking leads me to the conclusion that (probably with > version 4 but it's not exactly clear from the changelog) procps has made > some significant changes to it's API. So, unless igt-gpu-tools (and > probably others) are fixed upstream they remain broken. Fixes through > simple regex-magic in our build-phases might be possible, but I am not > confident enough in the matter to guarantee that the package would not > just build but be broken in a more specific manner. > > Is there an easy way to check which dependents of procps are actually > broken currently? Or is it really just igt-gpu-tools? > > There's two ways to go (I'd be happy for some input and volunteer to do > the actual leg-work): > 1. Add an additional procps-3 package with the older API to fix the > broken packages. > 2. Leave it as-is and wait for an upstream change of the currently > broken packages. I have found the upstream issue: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/-/issues/116 We can wait it out until the release, which will be out Soon (tm), or we make use of the patch that debian applies to igt-gpu-tools so it can work with the new libproc2 API: https://salsa.debian.org/xorg-team/app/intel-gpu-tools/-/blob/067ddd789fd80c12972fb92db8f93fadbdc4530e/debian/patches/libproc2_library AFAICS, this would not lead to a world-rebuild. Thoughts? - Jelle