From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id oFB0GOipFmcnugAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:22:16 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id oFB0GOipFmcnugAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:22:16 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lease-up.com header.s=2017 header.b="Dqj3H2/v"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1729538536; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=8SQ77gZHQ8DKj/FUmzr0ms+X7lhYVCQA1Fx9rhtOgRk=; b=O+4AvOOM9TSEw8Li2noGo2u0VMsE/VscwKwTuXmPHfiROJeJjI2UlbzKkcPtgiZ2/erWRk /h0xFIMgashdNbVy4z4KFUgSvox7YwLW9MRejUKvqVmmFfN0bv2kzVnQKmtlh40JlXHIul RVF4UW/ziH0+My2ZMITUa7usa8OqErPeW3Lbhhn/fxabBqxdU+v9y3QYEl28+Phfo8vzyO 1AElMBfhkNRmJsHwqBNk1lwW7MvncVHctjOiCYC5MZiF1ZfN2BOmRb42Vop2nlxQ6ifleW I4cxeNJjU98vpdsruwh8KkBMzxe3qObrf46d9uXWsqjtU0wOfMJAH47dtimyuA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1729538536; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=u3SsCPoyMI5r/7Ajt7ekZF4+a8o+Got96U+pX1fSIX1MZlonPmfeDMn1Gc8QE860crr5Ab QsPurSygHdTLenjcxycqEJWKufj/kHrJPo+SIYXH8u38uoXm8/BKjUqIWQkFe/fVt8DjJ4 dvT4+gcGdhZh2Mu30pFnDphRGGU9zuGCGdwISSs2E8UfUrcUAC6VwFLfmOy5WEN2CaCbxr wOBr7QFbRadjspKxX3LisWE9P3SZ16XNF1Sev0MjjWywtZT2R3OvHb3lq0UAIBNOPB4uGJ xMlOH1KHWV/JkY28ykUJB7Fm2yEljn/3pAsVfEa4a52u0nz99mvV3EjGQpUPdg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lease-up.com header.s=2017 header.b="Dqj3H2/v"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813D41DE2 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:22:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t2xy8-00041z-Rd; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:21:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t2xy7-00041q-FQ for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:21:31 -0400 Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t2xy4-0007ai-VL for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:21:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=8SQ77gZHQ8DKj/F Umzr0ms+X7lhYVCQA1Fx9rhtOgRk=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=lease-up.com; b=Dqj3H2/vI+vU52iYd5wtUSED1TqZ0GUFQrsWrHdK AKr2nniD0h5i0PMf3yUmMIr8YjpwcAW7V2AFcedAMay36rSZhMzw7BLkeKSB5ZUeTdp17e H4wsTKg6xi8V3rZTqLLoLWFfZqfWwaCRyI7e9Gvfi7o8aQfN5SAdSJtZCbVMo= Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id d4b3562b (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:21:23 +0000 (UTC) To: Nicolas Graves Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: Is it dangerous to run guix home/system reconfigure from an uninstalled / development Guix profile? In-Reply-To: <87jze1v4cq.fsf@ngraves.fr> (Nicolas Graves's message of "Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:54:29 +0200") References: <87jze1v4cq.fsf@ngraves.fr> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:21:21 -0700 Message-ID: <877ca1qn2m.fsf@lease-up.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=208.82.101.137; envelope-from=felix.lechner@lease-up.com; helo=sail-ipv4.us-core.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Felix Lechner From: Felix Lechner via Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.24 X-Spam-Score: -2.24 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 813D41DE2 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-TUID: qeDS22jozjUV Hi Nicolas, On Mon, Oct 21 2024, Nicolas Graves wrote: > I wonder if there are any hazards to using a development version of > Guix Only you know what's in it! I use my own development branch exclusively to reconfigure my systems. Also, as an aside, does Guix recommend anything other than the official development branch? Kind regards Felix