From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Gtk+ 3
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:16:42 +0200
Message-ID: <8761tf6f6d.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20131001112428.GA7062@debian> <877gdxtcki.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20131001193515.GA22534@debian> <87d2no8wq0.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20131002103936.GA5856@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51473)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VRLR9-0005rV-PV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 08:21:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VRLR2-0001O6-R6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 08:21:51 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:50752)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1VRLR2-0001Ny-Kr
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 08:21:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20131002103936.GA5856@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 2
	Oct 2013 12:39:36 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:14:47AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> So that means GTK+ 3 actually works, right?  That=E2=80=99s cool!
>
> This is a good question, since none of the packages I am interested in
> uses gtk+ so far. But I am working on packaging one ;-)
>
> I tried to use the slideshow binary from the racket package; it fails with
> ffi-lib: couldn't open "libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0" (libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot=
 open shared object file: No such file or directory)
>   context...:
> So it also requires gtk+-2; apparently an error in the configure script.
> I will also revert this back.

OK.

> xnee has only one binary, cnee, which fails for me with
> Error number:   6
>   Error:        Wrong paramters
>   Description:  You have given invalid input to Xnee=20
>   Argument:     (NO ARG)
> At least, it does not look gtk+-related. On the other hand, "ldd cnee"
> does not show anything gtk+-related either, nor does "guix gc --reference=
s";
> so maybe the input gtk+ is not actually used at all?

I think Xnee has an optional gnee program (or something like that) that
provides a GTK+ GUI.  But maybe it explicitly checks for gtk+-2.0 and
just disables that when that is not found?

I=E2=80=99ll check if Geeqie works and report back.

Ludo=E2=80=99.