From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: xorg: Add unclutter. Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:06:57 +0400 Message-ID: <8761hhnj3i.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r406o0lo.fsf@gmail.com> <20140824103959.GB12608@debian> <87egw6nit0.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49016) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XLoMo-0002ik-0g for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 03:07:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XLoMi-0005yd-17 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 03:07:01 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]:64205) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XLoMh-0005yX-PS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 03:06:55 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z11so11765073lbi.17 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leviafan (128-70-193-103.broadband.corbina.ru. [128.70.193.103]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g8sm23596404lam.23.2014.08.25.00.06.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:06:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87egw6nit0.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Sun, 24 Aug 2014 17:00:59 +0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost (2014-08-24 17:00 +0400) wrote: > Andreas Enge (2014-08-24 14:39 +0400) wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 10:36:35AM +0400, Alex Kost wrote: >>> I think =E2=80=9Cxorg.scm=E2=80=9D is a proper place for it or should i= t be put in a >>> separate file? >> >> xorg.scm should contain only the x.org system proper, plus some dependen= cies >> needed to compile it. > > Ah, sorry. Here is the new patch. As I have an access to the git repo now, I'm going to push it, unless someone has comments/objections. -- Alex Kost