From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: gnu: Add CLISP. Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:35:44 -0500 Message-ID: <8761b6tga7.fsf@netris.org> References: <87lhk2eloq.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <20150212212052.687467f1@PocketWee> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMAmt-0006yD-KG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:35:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMAmq-000428-Ep for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:35:43 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:47106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMAmp-00041C-P6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:35:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150212212052.687467f1@PocketWee> (Eric Bavier's message of "Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:20:52 -0600") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Bavier Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Eric Bavier writes: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:48:05 +0100 > taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer) wrote: > >> From 6201470b3e6c2410be7f38d8cc1cc99c3b13f0da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: =3D?UTF-8?q?Taylan=3D20Ulrich=3D20Bay=3DC4=3DB1rl=3DC4=3DB1/Kammer= ?=3D >> >> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:19:52 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add CLISP. I agree with all of Eric's feedback, with one exception: >> + (description "GNU CLISP is an implementation of ANSI Common >> Lisp, with +many extensions. It includes an interpreter, compiler, > ^ > "+many" -> "many" [...] > Copy and paste + wrapping errors? ;) This seems to be a problem on your end, Eric. I guess that your mail client word-wrapped Taylan's patch. The '+'s you see intermixed were at the beginning of each line of the patch, of course. >> + ;; Website says gpl2+, COPYRIGHT file says gpl2; actual source >> files have >> + ;; a lot of gpl3+. (Also some parts are under non-copyleft >> licenses, such >> + ;; as CLX by Texas Instruments.) >> + (license (list license:gpl2 license:gpl2+ license:gpl3+)))) > > I think in this case the gpl3+ might "win out", but I'll let others > comment on that. Yes, I think that's correct. Okay to push with these changes. Thanks! Mark PS: It might now be possible to bootstrap sbcl from source code using either clisp or ecl. Any takers?