From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul van der Walt Subject: Re: [Sebastian Ramacher] Re: zathura license Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:51:48 +0100 Message-ID: <8761alj557.fsf@denknerd.org> References: <87bnkehrgy.fsf@denknerd.org> <20150228174309.GA2964@ramacher.at> <877fv2hqrd.fsf@denknerd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRlYT-0002Qv-ED for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:51:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRlYN-0007Gs-1J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:51:57 -0500 Received: from mx02.posteo.de ([89.146.194.165]:56472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRlYM-0007Gh-RS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:51:50 -0500 Received: from dovecot03.posteo.de (unknown [185.67.36.28]) by mx02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4921725AF516 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:51:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dovecot03.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3kvb054KYSz5vN2 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:51:49 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: <877fv2hqrd.fsf@denknerd.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Guix-devel Um, i'm sorry for the noise on the mailing list, i just realised Zlib is packaged in Guix, so i looked, and i can use the built-in `license:zlib`. /me goes into the corner to feel ashamed :p Ciao, p. On 2015-02-28 at 18:47, quoth Paul van der Walt: > I'd like to package a program with the "zlib license" which i hadn't > heard of before. How would i do that given that it seems `license:..` > terms only exist for GPL and BSD, roughly? > > According to The Internet this license is GPL compatible, so can i go > ahead?