From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add Attic backup program Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 23:05:35 +0300 Message-ID: <87613w8ru8.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZW8ru-0000pX-Jl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 16:06:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZW8rp-0004l4-Gm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 16:06:22 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:35510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZW8rp-0004kt-A5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 16:06:17 -0400 Received: by lbcbn3 with SMTP id bn3so50714386lbc.2 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 13:05:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:16:24 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari (2015-08-26 20:16 +0300) wrote: > This patchset adds the Attic backup program [1]. > > Your comments are requested! > > I read the guidelines about naming Python modules based on their Python version > compatibility [2]. They don't seem to require changing the upstream name of > msgpack-python to python-msgpack but I noticed that it was done for > html5lib-python. Plus, package-with-python2 won't work as is on > 'msgpack-python', so I made the change. If the change is not desired, I can > manually create the Python 2 module, but it's nice to have it automatically > generated like this. > > I noticed that FUSE is in linux.scm. llfuse, on the other hand, supports Linux, > OS X, FreeBSD, and NetBSD, so I put it in its own module. What about a fuse > module? Ah, sorry, I read this after replying to your 'llfuse' patch. I agree on separating fuse module, as there are several fuse-related packages (sshfs-fuse, unionfs-fuse, fuse-exfat). -- Alex