From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add TopHat. Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 08:51:58 +0100 Message-ID: <8760ykvild.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> References: <56A20EE1.8050204@uq.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41511) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMszT-0000qV-BB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 02:52:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMszQ-0002fN-4f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 02:52:11 -0500 Received: from pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.20]:60293) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMszP-0002fF-Ui for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 02:52:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <56A20EE1.8050204@uq.edu.au> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ben Woodcroft Cc: guix-devel Ben Woodcroft writes: >> + ;; TopHat is released under the Boost Software License, Version 1= .0 >> + ;; See https://github.com/infphilo/tophat/issues/11#issuecomment-= 121589893 >> + (license (license:x11-style "http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt= " >> + "Some components have other similar l= icences.")))) > Am I right in thinking that the only other license used is asl2.0 ? If=20 > so why not say so? I just copied this from the =E2=80=9Cboost=E2=80=9D package. After Ludo=E2= =80=99s comment I changed that to just =E2=80=9Clicense:boost1.0=E2=80=9D. Maybe we can re= place the license field for Boost with =E2=80=9C(license license:boost1.0)=E2=80=9D= as well? ~~ Ricardo