From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Review process Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:09:32 +0200 Message-ID: <8760rvcelf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <579027b7.VHXjhpPxQC3AAmeY%pjotr.public12@email> <8760rznoh1.fsf@gnu.org> <20160722004130.GA10340@thebird.nl> <874m7hk6dz.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <20160723022421.GA15436@thebird.nl> <878twsg1xb.fsf@gmail.com> <87k2gc3cn8.fsf@gnu.org> <87poq3cvkz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54725) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRK6E-0005cm-DB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:09:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRK6C-0005mp-H4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:09:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87poq3cvkz.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:02:36 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost skribis: > Mathieu Lirzin (2016-07-23 12:51 +0300) wrote: > >> Alex Kost writes: [...] >>> I just wrote this because I'm almost sure that some day I will maintain >>> emacs interface separately from Guix again. I've been regretting all >>> the time that it became a part of Guix. >> >> I am interested to know what do you miss from that the period you were >> maintaining it separately? > > Oh, this is easy: if I maintain something myself, I don't ask anyone, I > just commit whatever seems appropriate to me, and that's it. When I > send patches for emacs UI to the mailing list, it's like I ask > permissions to modify a part of code I wrote. Let=E2=80=99s make it crystal clear: to me, you have full authority over the guix.el code. I=E2=80=99ve stated it several times, but maybe not clearly enough. Apolog= ies! IOW, I think it=E2=80=99s fine if you commit directly changes to these part= s of the code. Of course, I appreciate discussion when making non-trivial feature changes=E2=80=94discussion not with me specifically, but with users. It would be a great loss and a technical hindrance if guix.el was moved out of Guix. I don=E2=80=99t want that to happen, so let me know what the ransom should be! ;-) Ludo=E2=80=99.