From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Separate Mailing Lists for Patches vs General Dev Discussion? Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:34:10 +0200 Message-ID: <8760rsa88t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5796782D.1010104@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bS1Yz-00078G-JL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:34:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bS1Yu-0006gq-0S for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:34:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5796782D.1010104@gmx.net> (Florian Paul Schmidt's message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2016 22:35:57 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Florian Paul Schmidt Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello! Florian Paul Schmidt skribis: > I'm following the Guix-Project, even if not contributing much because > of time constraints. The one, very simple to implement, thing that > would make following the project more easy IMHO would be a separate > list for patches. Or maybe the other way around: A separate list for > more general discussion :) > > What do you think? GCC has a gcc-patches@ mailing list in addition to gcc@. However, as a passerby, I found it=E2=80=99s not super clear whether to use gcc@, or gcc-patches@, or the Bugzilla instance. So I=E2=80=99m not sure it would improve the situation. Thoughts? FWIW, I filter help-guix, guix-devel, and guix-sysadmin in separate folders, and then I use Gnus=E2=80=99 scoring mechanism for things in guix-= devel (you could assign a low score to messages whose subject contains =E2=80=9C[PATCH]=E2=80=9D for instance.) Ludo=E2=80=99.