From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add python-pafy. Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 18:52:50 +0000 Message-ID: <8760o3nkl9.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <20161102104057.8226-1-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20161102104057.8226-2-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <6243fef2-6ea1-24b7-b45b-8601948f59df@crazy-compilers.com> <87k2cj3y7o.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <581CD674.2040607@crazy-compilers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2jbn-00010d-Eh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 14:53:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2jbk-00064s-BL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 14:52:59 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:45455) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2jbk-00062R-5O for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 14:52:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <581CD674.2040607@crazy-compilers.com> (Hartmut Goebel's message of "Fri, 4 Nov 2016 19:41:56 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Hartmut Goebel Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hartmut Goebel writes: > Am 04.11.2016 um 19:18 schrieb ng0: >> Hartmut Goebel writes: >> >>> Am 02.11.2016 um 11:40 schrieb ng0: >>>> + (inputs >>>> + `(("youtube-dl" ,youtube-dl))) >>> This needs to be a propagated input since python-pafy is a package itself. >> Can you be more specific? I know now that other python inputs >> should be propagated, but why non-python software? Or is >> youtube-dl just another python software? > > Oh, sorry, I thought you know that youtube-dl is a python tool. (I not > it since I'm using it myself). Ah, thanks. I use it, but I have forgotten which language it is written in as it is not relevant for me. > > Basically you were right: tools do not need to be propagated (at least > as far as I understood). > > But the reason this needs to be propagated is: it is not used as a tool > (via some system-call or such), but the python package is imported, see > . > I have to admit that this is not obvious. Ok, thanks for the explanation. I will add this with a comment to a new revision of the patch series.