From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: state of darcs Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 13:19:39 +0000 Message-ID: <8760lv55ec.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87d1hdn8t4.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20161130205259.GD11793@jasmine> <87polcwtq6.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOlTH-00078J-0u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:19:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOlTD-0002tv-To for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:19:15 -0500 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:57457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOlTD-0002tb-LP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:19:11 -0500 Received: from [10.9.9.212] (helo=mailfront12.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOlTC-0000RQ-96 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:19:10 +0100 Received: from tor01.zencurity.dk ([185.129.62.62] helo=localhost) by mailfront12.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1cOlT2-0000ft-6t for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:19:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87polcwtq6.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org ng0 writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:52:07PM +0000, ng0 wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I wanted to ask wether you made any progress with my darcs >>> package or if there's anything other people can help out with or >>> test. >> >> The only thing left is to make it use the TLS certificate store >> correctly, right? >> >> I seem to remember that the WIP Darcs package fails to connect to TLS >> servers when it can't find the certificate store. Is that right? That's >> better than if it silently fails to validate the server's certificate. > > Yes, that's correct. And as far as I can recall discussions, it > was because of some other application, curl maybe? I'm not sure. > > The interaction with non-tls darcs servers worked. > -- > ♥Ⓐ ng0 | ng0.chaosnet.org > > It seems as if fixing curl is in the way for darcs and curl and gnurl and the pastebin I've sent several months ago. I try to fix curl then, hope this will help to prevent these patches from falling to bitrot. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 PGP keys and more: https://n0is.noblogs.org/ http://ng0.chaosnet.org