Re: Guix package incubator (later a channel)

[Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>]

Pjotr Prins writes:

> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:44:48PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
>> Just a reply on the notabug question (I don't have much time otherwise):
>> Notabug will eventually move to an instance of pagure.io, you can read
>> about this in their own issues where I asked about some question back
>> then (no link, sorry .. my name was 'ng0' back on there). Developing
>> with pagure might be easier (fedora and surrounding communities)
>> compared to the situation they describe in the issue.
>> I started packaging pagure for this reason, which is about ~85% done
>> (services + pagure itself left to wrap it up ... pagure itself is more
>> or less done, just the service are needed. I'm more than happy to pass
>> this on (could rebase the pagure patch), as I know I have taken on some
>> tasks which would be better handled by different people :)
>> That is in case you want to use a GuixSD as a host, otherwise you should
>> not have many problems.
>
> That would be a great result :). Also pagure looks very interesting -
> simpler than gitlab. I like simple.

It does look good:

  Open data: Sources, doc, ticket and pull-requests meta-data are
  available in the web interface but also in git repos which can thus be
  cloned and changed locally.

That's really appealing.