From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42491)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dAtSF-0007Qg-Ob
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 03:33:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dAtSA-0007cy-R6
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 03:33:07 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46819)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dAtSA-0007c3-Nv
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 03:33:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dAtSA-0008QB-IP
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 03:33:02 -0400
Subject: bug#26926: [PATCH] gnu: update Mes to 0.6.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.26926.B26926.149500635532338@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <87inl3770q.fsf@gnu.org> <87k25g5zyi.fsf@gnu.org>
	<8760h05vx2.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 09:32:05 +0200
In-Reply-To: <8760h05vx2.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Tue, 16
	May 2017 23:33:29 +0200")
Message-ID: <8760h02b2i.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
Cc: 26926@debbugs.gnu.org

Heya,

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:

> What I call Mescc is a Scheme program that can be executed (interpreted)
> by Mes, but it can also be run by Guile.  Like so:
>
>     guix package -i nyacc mes
>     guile -c '(use-modules (language c99 compiler)) (with-input-from-stri=
ng "int main () {return printf (\"Hi Mescc\n\");}" c99-input->elf)' > a.out
>     chmod +x a.out
>     ./a.out
>
>        =3D> Hi Mescc
>
> Does this make it more explicit?

Yes, thanks!  It looks very exciting.

>>> +         ,@(if (or (equal? (%current-system) "x86_64-linux")
>>> +                   (equal? (%current-target-system) "x86_64-linux"))
>>
>> Note that %current-system is a =E2=80=9Csystem type=E2=80=9D like =E2=80=
=9Cx86_64-linux=E2=80=9D
>> whereas %current-target-system is a GNU triplet like
>> =E2=80=9Cx86_64-linux-pc-gnu=E2=80=9D.  Thus, the second line should be
>>
>>   (string-prefix? (%current-target-system) "x86_64-linux")
>
> Ah...ok.  As an aside: would we want to to change one of these names?

You mean like renaming =E2=80=98%current-target-system=E2=80=99 to
=E2=80=98%current-target-triplet=E2=80=99 for example?  Why not, it would p=
robably help
avoid this confusion.

>> Please read =E2=80=98HACKING=E2=80=99 for the details.  Before pushing, =
can you reply to
>> this message and sign your reply with the OpenPGP key that you=E2=80=99l=
l use
>> to sign commits?  Also please upload your OpenPGP key to Savannah.
>
> Okay, great!

Awesome, that was long overdue.

Thank you!

Ludo=E2=80=99.