From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5ZES-0003uv-Hu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:29:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5ZEN-0006QH-0b for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:29:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5ZEM-0006Pn-TN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:29:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e5ZEL-0007Bx-Lw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:29:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28593] [PATCH] gnu: openfoam: Clean up to reduce closure. Resent-Message-ID: From: Dave Love References: <20170925104459.17798-1-fx@gnu.org> <87fubbj5yr.fsf@gnu.org> <1506426036.2423.32.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <873779hdci.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9piit59.fsf@gnu.org> <1507547167.17241.18.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <87o9p3mm73.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk> <87d15jjpuc.fsf@gnu.org> <1508495524.2713.20.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <87y3o6vz0t.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:28:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y3o6vz0t.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Court\=E8s\?\= \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?\=22's\?\= message of "Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:28:50 +0200") Message-ID: <8760b9lty6.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 28593@debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Garlick Ludovic Court=E8s writes: >> https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-news-announcements-other/1938= 65-openfoam-4-1-packaged-gnu-guix.html > > Nice! > > It will be interesting to see to what extent it helps OpenFOAM users and > developers address their deployment issues. In my experience of offering rpms and build advice, in the UK they're remarkably resistant to making life easy, or at least their support people are. Actually, that's not unique to OF; sigh.