From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNmSg-0007lK-5c for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 16:15:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNmSd-0002PK-0d for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 16:15:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45493) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNmSc-0002Ow-Sf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 16:15:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNmSc-0003wh-Ie for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 16:15:02 -0500 Subject: bug#28886: [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-robe. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: References: <20171018062027.14406-1-mail@cbaines.net> <87h8uw42qi.fsf@elephly.net> <87374r4dnh.fsf@elephly.net> From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <87374r4dnh.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 21:14:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87609f7ge4.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 28886-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi again, > > some time ago I wrote this: > > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Hi, >> >>> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-robe): New variable. >>> --- >> >> Thanks, this looks good. >> >> The website lists a couple of Ruby dependencies: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> * pry >> * pry-doc >=3D 0.6.0 (on MRI) >> * method_source >=3D 0.8.2 (for compatibility with the latest >> Rubinius) >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> yet, I don=E2=80=99t see them among the inputs of this package. Is this= just >> something that users are reasonably expected to have on their systems >> when they want to use robe, or should these things be among the inputs? >> >> I trust you made the right decision here, but I thought I=E2=80=99d just= ask as >> it is a bit confusing. > > =E2=80=9Cpry=E2=80=9D is a ruby debugger, right? It is a runtime depende= ncy, but one > would expect a Ruby developer to provide one version or another, > dependent on their project. > > If this is correct I don=E2=80=99t want to block this patch: it looks goo= d to > me. Ok, great. I was planning on trying to use this more, but I haven't got around to that yet. I've pushed this to master now, maybe that will help. Thanks for reviewing :) Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlosUkNfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9Xe68Q//QC5xLD72bRwXXkNKjUx0BNC44BMesAFjMDHtZkzTG+qUi9jCAsmcMaHs QTwIkrEcTT2l3idWpfnLpGCyPM/rVfQU3L8bf3CV4AgivuMSegbMc3qoj9id68pH zp8b7mbxueR7zX1bFVr9N9GVV63f9W4k2cijodzqKwL6WKNSAnSfpEG1Gdtn8g1/ n0sDElXF0e8lX+pKCPT6N+EYIyxRNUb5jaf3sppRkwasikBhLZxE083LrlMmwXVe 8HI4CuHZ2xzoqP56D7CNigHDiI7Xi9OxuXBFHBfivkNjnE4aA/SgrxTkr3SRAbFe l50Ki/rJYWBma7+yasemWCVtbpzc7CmcvZgRJA0sGa1G16Q4VvT0Mb10bvtGgowx pQhS0cfvVTL72Y+c1l2TNFjobDpU8Bka5Q1oKe4ycCzLwvHS+ojBWVEA/Do91QXA vD0RWiLNyx/iP1cXaadhugSHmtlFS9aI+tnD3g/4o3xot4lB97+NYALiCdKKyAQm yV9mQUNUuj6IGlW9nd20BuAKShAMoTRXazhlD/IibQrOwmCboCPoybk33U/u2BvL PYNa9uKAcgUOXptzHAEDehkYW/RnLCW4VcJr8Hcekht1nCa0SI1+U6wxpUdAr2b3 3ZQ9itHcOx3GvzioSydFtQEEIx3HrEVUCxRm53kGJ7CSpuVgO9c= =tTaf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--