From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Iso image size Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:23:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87609d62j7.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOKJg-0002JO-JR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 04:24:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOKJb-0003lm-NQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 04:24:04 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]:36742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOKJb-0003kt-Gb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 04:23:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits"'s message of "Fri, 8 Dec 2017 08:06:33 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: Guix-devel Hello, G=C3=A1bor Boskovits skribis: > I don't know what we are currently doing to get the installer iso image > sized down, but I caught some discussion yesterday on irc, that the image > is actually very well compressible, and checking the sizes it really is. > > Might that be possible to do something like compressing the root filesyst= em > image on the iso image, and decompress it from initrd before mounting? Wouldn=E2=80=99t it be complex and memory-intensive? To me the efforts should go into reducing the size of our packages. For example, in =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99, guile, glibc, and guix are alre= ady noticeably smaller; likewise, the recently-introduced =E2=80=98groff-minima= l=E2=80=99 allowed us to get rid of Perl in the installation system closure. We should keep working in that direction IMO. Ludo=E2=80=99.