From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: Is it necessary to run "make" before "make check"? Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 18:26:15 -0800 Message-ID: <8760946abc.fsf@gmail.com> References: <878teet12q.fsf@gmail.com> <20171217142630.19ffa647@scratchpost.org> <20171217151213.47ccd4a3@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQl8L-0002cW-R8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:26:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQl8J-0002uC-Pa for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:26:25 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::236]:35365) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQl8J-0002sR-Ci for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:26:23 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id j124so9101539pfc.2 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 18:26:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20171217151213.47ccd4a3@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Sun, 17 Dec 2017 15:12:13 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Danny Milosavljevic writes: > On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 14:26:30 +0100 > Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > >> Hi, >>=20 >> On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:17:49 -0800 >> Chris Marusich wrote: >>=20 >> > Is it necessary to run "make" before "make check",=20=20=20 >>=20 >> No. >>=20 >> >or is it good enough >> > to just run "make check" and rely on Make to build whatever needs to be >> > built to run "make check"?=20=20 >>=20 >> Yes. >>=20 >> See the Makefile: >>=20 >> all: $(BUILT_SOURCES) >> check: $(BUILT_SOURCES) > > And also > > check-am: all-am > all-am: ... > > And also a Rube-Goldberg-esque contraption for all-recursive, check-recur= sive which invokes "make" inside SUBDIRS. *shakes head* Thank you for pointing to the relevant lines in the Makefile! > Interesting :) That's one way to put it... :-) =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlo3J0gACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp2Vig//eme3SV1chNoMa2zvHtUf0a4Vv1tJfX1YK957KK0n7ZZQnoT3hs+/0YnN WyBOtWxLO++9VzKTWFc3jBsJdVIJ9HZNpOSdKjlkfaXMNvjD+9nke17v3zfoXubJ +0LTg1qRBdS9maRZ7NtY6pbD9y6PnY38g31qitH4VVh4uzb7RCi7lKHrftD5c2CW dlIjghmkgEGJ/PmfuRUQPuA2c3RLm3vAIajq+/NM2aML1XgtQZ/Tb62g3Sc24d3t J50YNsrAwMYmjLfORo/MW7uIY3+HjaX7SYzALAvRl0eVU3ifRDixxkPat7HMbp+w xWKCM+oaPXmKhpnc8F+lWyNaj6FbLW7EFRqqiMYF+3a0inYHww8G1Wgxods6nH3+ xEX5nxksMLHHu84MbIJdtrQXixftxQ916I3pUBTC7b6EmVIA0Kn2Wbec8wtCV3Ie F3qCkuo3Cslphk1curpGYQy23v8XP16Z7Ci1kD4LZD1YPpDdrvsJ5Ifxqj50fcto rA2r+doIbE/nH+Sr6TPqRtvxM/K/8rqml1uyltsJT0XXaegkfloGvTPIJbXo8lif c9dD810po+P6e9zyoB/D17HId+05CyBZ4vswbZCckFYI10zlJy9sBSuSerRs3cFS +3sc5jKwdWZtdarsBHkWUL6rQSK43v4EL5HZyZM7tUReryUPBZg= =+s+f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--