From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brett Gilio Subject: Octave & QtOctave Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 18:56:36 -0600 Message-ID: <875zwnqomz.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gQMFe-0004mG-Ol for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 19:56:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gQMFY-0006Zt-Fg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 19:56:50 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:56847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gQMFW-0006LL-PE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 19:56:43 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96BA116005D for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 01:56:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 431vrk3BCtz6tm7 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 01:56:38 +0100 (CET) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel Hey all, Happy guix birthday! Quick question, why is the octave package split up into two different public definitions, rather than just having the QtOctave-GUI being a "gui" output, like it is for transmissionBT and some others? Best, Brett Gilio