From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: 02/02: import: Update opam importer. Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:59:22 +0100 Message-ID: <875zvpwoj9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20181218212618.4f655d4e@centurylink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181218212618.4f655d4e@centurylink.net> (Eric Bavier's message of "Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:26:18 -0600") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-commits-bounces+gcggs-guix-commits=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-commits" To: Eric Bavier Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, julien@lepiller.eu, guix-commits@gnu.org List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org Hi Eric, Eric Bavier skribis: >> commit cce654fabdf09cac7d18f9bad842ba8445aa022c >> Author: Julien Lepiller >> Date: Mon Dec 17 21:05:35 2018 +0100 >>=20 >> import: Update opam importer. >>=20=20=20=20=20 >> * guix/import/opam.scm: Update importer for opam 2. >> * tests/opam.scm: Update tests for the opam 2 importer. [...] > This commit breaks Guix compatibility with Guile 2.0: > > $ guix build -K --with-commit=3Dguile2.0-guix=3Dcce654fabf guile2.0-guix [...] > ?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f "~A ~S" ("no code for module" (ice-9 peg= )) #f] As discussed earlier, I=E2=80=99ll propose soon (like real soon!) a patch to remove support for 2.0. In that spirit, I think we can leave it as is. Besides, I=E2=80=99m glad you thought about using =E2=80=98--with-commit=E2= =80=99 for this use case. :-) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.