From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: Help identifying licenses Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 20:56:24 +0200 Message-ID: <875zl1ln3b.fsf@nckx> References: <644c16fbe6b0151174a3a91e67c1dba092bfa778.camel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49387) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBhp-00048B-Bm for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:56:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBhl-0007cx-So for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:56:31 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2001:470:7405::1]:42284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBhl-0007a5-9i for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:56:29 -0400 Received: by tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 71f35d9e for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 18:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a5597980 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 18:56:26 +0000 (UTC) In-reply-to: <644c16fbe6b0151174a3a91e67c1dba092bfa778.camel@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: help-guix@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jesse, Jesse Gibbons =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > 1. newspeak > The author says bsd-like. I don't see any clauses or=20 > yelling. What should I > put for it? Here's the relevant snippet from debian/copyright: This is the =E2=80=98Expat=E2=80=99 licence, often ambiguously called =E2= =80=98MIT=E2=80=99. > 2. Kenny > The author says Artistic as found on debian in=20 > /usr/share/common- > licenses/Artistic. It is not found in (guix licenses), and=20 > sincee I do not > run debian from that era I cannot compare the text to verify the=20 > license's > identity. Here's the relevant snippet from debian/copyright: As noted on IRC: I've mirrored that file from a debian system[0].=20 What a mess: it's *almost*=20 ,=20 but not actually the same (e.g. points 3.e & 4.e are missing). Considering this is what Debian calls the =E2=80=98Artistic=E2=80=99 licenc= e,=20 though, we can be almost certain that other Guix packages have the=20 same subtle difference already. Kind regards, T G-R [0]: https://www.tobias.gr/Debian.Artistic.txt --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl2aONgACgkQ2Imw8BjF STx23BAAhwNRh6XfBGsG5FJLeUtOzzK3ftZ3NmVGrnOQ2jitegETqQzniWuoIprY BalRMJ2H242baNCp8/ltn4cZFLBpEYkm4fhyVLRf57AZGCzIfr6QNt1U5b2zdcKv RAycsqMNUElP06qHvd/XmfJDk53eIUv9kgJZhxX5KwKyGO6MozLyITafVT45mi6I YdwrOMTfmiBwzBA/MFnZkRwIJqR1EynAHz0c6czKEKoMhyC6nycG8lBWqeceOrOL tU9UzdIYG0SJEfPZhZ1smNe4NOb1LdeMaGM/qlDedZpyDkHXWe19V4X6V5rKoTdx m/XfH6eKQXajywhdQ6PLU2sQ/acIGzEOEjMsYjH37j+5HzZZERQSL8nLqRbP0BAV LYpl737Hs5hcYxzopskqqGH9YLS4FnEeO2wOMRncOTI2pyImdCJuV/sIuznWLVaF RjzK1R5Ug9SNpGBXsQcpK5Xg9Tdod2zDudw/Y64w/lnPmWNiHD5HmAS0ovibuzMH UGux7mIyiZyU8LgVE5ItXdu1QzEMDrl1XB4KWtayqcuLHzU3pmM93nxDjLugxB+f rXplWXuuqdi921sA/Y/gWELNV/Vl88iGFDx9fcUE6roFxm7uHhXOjmNLApT89jy/ l2wPxbtRceC2JviNpiFygSbSbLb8fOi9eeuC9rTsWYDlNR7HkDw= =D86N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--