From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timothy Sample Subject: Re: Stackage LTS 14 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 01:58:23 -0500 Message-ID: <875zjpa8ds.fsf@ngyro.com> References: <87mudt7h7a.fsf@ngyro.com> <87a79tj8mq.fsf@elephly.net> <87ftjjwdf7.fsf@devup.no> <87h83oz1bx.fsf@ngyro.com> <87sgn4xlus.fsf@ngyro.com> <87zhh53a5h.fsf@ngyro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iUQ8D-0001yi-S8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 01:58:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUQ8C-0000Jq-An for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 01:58:29 -0500 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:41259) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUQ8B-0000Jj-Vt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 01:58:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zhh53a5h.fsf@ngyro.com> (Timothy Sample's message of "Sat, 09 Nov 2019 00:12:58 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel Hi again, Timothy Sample writes: > However, I have a really weird problem. When I build =E2=80=9Cgit-annex= =E2=80=9D, I > build > > /gnu/store/5i2x293qn45dwg2rv6vy45s0r9jbnv8l-git-annex-7.20191024.drv > > and it succeeds. On the build farm, it=E2=80=99s > > /gnu/store/fj5kyjkblxzcxbs6di1kd29j6fpsjvgk-git-annex-7.20191024.drv > > and it fails. I=E2=80=99ve tried =E2=80=9Cclean-go=E2=80=9D and indeed = =E2=80=9Cgit clean=E2=80=9D followed by > bootstrapping and configuring again. This does not help. I took the > log from the build farm and diffed it with my local build log, and all > the interesting parts (e.g., the store paths of everything that goes in > =E2=80=9CGHC_PACKAGE_PATH=E2=80=9D) match exactly. > > Any ideas? It would be helpful if someone tried on another machine and > check if it matches the build farm or not. It=E2=80=99s probably somethi= ng > silly, but I can=E2=80=99t figure it out. I just built this on another machine, and I get the same results as my first machine. Maybe something strange has happened on the build farm.... > Here=E2=80=99s the list of failing packages. [...] Here=E2=80=99s an updated list. Help wanted: ngless-0.9.1.x86_64-linux xmobar-0.28.x86_64-linux These two look like they just need to be updated. They both seem to need a few new dependencies, though. For instance, =E2=80=9Cngless=E2=80= =9D needs four new Haskell packages for the most recent version. It should be straight-forward. There are a lot of options when building =E2=80=9Cxmobar= =E2=80=9D, which is why I=E2=80=99ve been avoiding it. Depending on the options, it n= eeds different dependencies. If we have any =E2=80=9Cxmobar=E2=80=9D users, I w= ould love your input for the update! Otherwise, I will do my best to make reasonable (if rather uninformed) choices. Broken before GHC update (i.e., should not block merge): beast-0.10.0.x86_64-linux hedgewars-0.9.25.x86_64-linux rapicorn-16.0.0.x86_64-linux =E2=80=9CWorks for me=E2=80=9D: git-annex-7.20191024.x86_64-linux Could be deleted: ghc-haddock-api-2.19.0.1.x86_64-linux =E2=80=93 needed for haddock ghc-haddock-2.19.0.1.x86_64-linux =E2=80=93 haddock is already provided= by GHC corrode-0.0.1-b6699fb.x86_64-linux =E2=80=93 no updates in years > Finally, there are some packages that have unneeded other versions now. > For instance, we used to have newer versions (than LTS 12) of some > packages for Idris. Those packages could probably be deleted, but I > need to track them all down. This still needs doing, but I=E2=80=99m pretty sure it=E2=80=99s just =E2= =80=9Cghc-megaparsec-7=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Cghc-network-2.8=E2=80=9D. -- Tim