From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: TeX Live 2019 wanted Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 15:49:57 +0100 Message-ID: <875zhgzq3u.fsf@elephly.net> References: <871rt6enh0.fsf@devup.no> <20191216185714.GA6488@jurong> <20191216194950.GA8280@jurong> <87tv60c8fx.fsf@devup.no> <87r213dhai.fsf@devup.no> <20191227100508.GA15022@jurong> <878smg1dsq.fsf@devup.no> <87tv51y4c8.fsf@devup.no> <87eew5ugmn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <878smdyn36.fsf@elephly.net> <87zheszubd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59549) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqeZ8-0004OW-01 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 09:50:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqeZ6-0003nh-Qq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 09:50:09 -0500 Received: from sender4-of-o54.zoho.com ([136.143.188.54]:21457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqeZ5-0003cI-Je for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 09:50:08 -0500 In-reply-to: <87zheszubd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Bug 33094 refers to this issue. > > There is no bug specifically about LaTeX, but LaTeX on Guix has been > broken for a year or so. I think it was only discussed informally on gui= x-devel. I=E2=80=99ve worked to fix incomplete packages some time ago. That=E2=80= =99s why I extended svn-fetch to accept multiple locations inside of an SVN repository, because TeX Live packages often are made up of files from various places in the repository. I also worked on the profile hook and the texlive-union procedure, which fixed a bunch of problems. I don=E2=80=99t think it=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Cbeen broken for a year=E2=80=9D= . I=E2=80=99m still using it without problems. I really think that the problem with LaTeX is overstated and it would be easier to fix individual problems if they had bug reports. I might take a look at 33094 later, but I wouldn=E2=80=99t mind at all if someone else did the work. --=20 Ricardo