From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: Inverted index to accelerate guix package search
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:12:55 +0100
Message-ID: <875zhdw0a0.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <cu7h810emy0.fsf@systemreboot.net> <87a76r68u6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <cu7a76re6nj.fsf@systemreboot.net>
 <CAJ3okZ23f4kuygoj_HS0+uKYGCad2ZV=u7DWuZ=-3vQXM_QYtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87muaqnmod.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87h80y12k3.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net>
 <CAJ3okZ06JKoq1=SNSH0hRm6xBJL+xoerOf7i5dHRsCu9VTMbpw@mail.gmail.com>
 <877e1tyaut.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ1Xw=PxYuw2i_QSiySjYxxxQrVMRXyTcRd6Mh3u=oXxrw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51670)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1irejX-0002VX-CK
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 04:13:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1irejT-0001Tz-Bc
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 04:13:03 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:47601)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1irejT-0001T5-5B
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 04:12:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ1Xw=PxYuw2i_QSiySjYxxxQrVMRXyTcRd6Mh3u=oXxrw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

> This size is the runtime size, right?

Yes.

> What about the "build time" size? Other said, all one needs to build
> to have xapian, i.e., the size of the full bag: starting from the
> bootstrap seed and having Guix+Xapian (vs. Guix alone).

As shows with guix graph?

This yields a small graph:
=2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
guix graph --type=3Dbag-emerged xapian | dot -Tpdf > dag.pdf
=2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

This yields a big graph:
=2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
guix graph --type=3Dbag xapian | dot -Tpdf > dag.pdf
=2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I don't know how it compares to other packages.

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl4e15cACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH+ILgf+NWC+JcBG2EtgoLHvJ8U+jBw4KUHsKzgq9/ZShEDCNMJu+SSAV0jlkkkg
YZp0QMs9vWBETd65LBkkHDRSEwG7q4GwpXclfYaSTybOH3IzlJrDaMEFzIQRHGJl
kY9wGFw73ChLVxckDDlCEXIvvyjp7kwLQHDWC8LzsXVt0sWNUwaiVyWNzzfF11oN
JSTzsIbVoxzHOXsuAnehcl80OL6RP3A/uWPSxe3h6tgJv9Vg4qC7QPoLfFS4oApy
j4TQAiUMM7xskE/nHgz9mw9jmfYUZwSsIu9H6pf21h45ysp/EwQX2iWoY6mbQtxv
2IETSVsou9qwe5HvdDKN/TNCvLGLrw==
=kt9E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--