From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 21:01:36 +0100 Message-ID: <875zg78vsk.fsf@nckx> References: <87y2t7j54n.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeuy2mua.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv3ticcx.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1yxe1z7.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv3tgtv2.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41233) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j33db-0007xz-8H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:02:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j33da-0007VK-54 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:02:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58671) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j33da-0007VC-21 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:02:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j33dZ-0003gq-W3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:02:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: zimoun , Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: 39575@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan, Simon, Janneke =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20190406T212022Z/pool/main/h/h= arfbuzz/harfbuzz_2.4.0.orig.tar.bz2 This is a wonderful resource! Thank you, Janneke (and Debian)! zimoun =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Cool! > But how do you determine the "date", i.e., this reference=20 > '20190406T212022Z' ? You'd take the timestamp immediately preceding your desired (Guix)=20 commit's date, or something like that. The fact that git commit=20 dates aren't linear shouldn't hurt here. > Could it be automated? Not without parsing HTML to get the valid timestamps:=20 . Also, this doesn't seem to be a supported service yet[0]: =E2=80=9CThis is an implementation for a possible snapshot.debian.org=20 service. It's not yet finished, it's more a prototype/proof of concept=20 to show and learn what we want and can provide. So far it seems to=20 actually work.=E2=80=9D Still really cool, T G-R [0]: https://salsa.debian.org/snapshot-team/snapshot --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl5ITiAACgkQ2Imw8BjF STyZ/g/+ISmQ/8XtgxmS23V9zyfenIJyLezEI+OOH/V5UjCy0BUwpBcN2TXJ1VBT MmNaZaLV+JfUxtJV8DcuQTy/p0q6nVTcFWPYA/mS4UJV6cu6+RAFW84xbtuWX1qe RLJPGy/1TBxlBLXfdBOHoZ3aT4ZZbaBL/VSjrdEUTNBD835l2gkPqWjZCvu9BtYp 4Mlt2VMqZSsCoXfICRanZ1CEUKTKW8QfkHCpWq+tWmsXQUEkc2ixS2YsRUGkQBOZ vuGfF/Cm/CF4TIOYXFMIeL6pPMBQq37MMAEUDqJx+VIgovk4U2GkdrdEVUyYRLP6 Hf0JGqPkU2gnYWOXucKX0rWwA8f3Yxu2SI/kXbthg/5eY3rZ/VhhumpIj/kXotfO hs2m0oCSXnA+vYzl5byu77XzNUgOxAfQH3wXQO/KTAgrStJINL9GIkcXtHARwGec GYm22g078Wlvr93vUwlm6yo1IP6HNqGZX0PB5BlEPVle4tFAtHarHa+0AjOjwYCQ Z11DxE6qwNG3/oqco/k3IQmsF6zeH4uDsFA/LDshvMqNT2oM9cZow2pMTURWYU7l Dy0Wsz+eDKW4rRYEl/M2m9tIXvGu8hNskY08LapEwxpOw6NVpYRu1KqJ2KXaNK5q GrPwMzA7ODmuTkj2g4nZ2omH41X/hF4OHGWrGmlc+lz6XbC4qxY= =OoYE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--