From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id sJslOVFZHV89fQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:22:09 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 8KDuNFFZHV8yZQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:22:09 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76D2B9400E1 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43422 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzdnE-00008T-GD for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 06:22:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35804) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzdn8-000082-5H for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 06:22:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40282) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzdn7-0000C3-ST for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 06:22:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jzdn7-00065Z-PH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 06:22:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#39695] [PATCH] [WIP] gnu: mono: Update to 6.8.0.105. Resent-From: Pierre Neidhardt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39695 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Brett Gilio Cc: 39695@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39695-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39695.159575891923397 (code B ref 39695); Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:22:01 +0000 Received: (at 39695) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2020 10:21:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51828 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jzdn4-00065I-VX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 06:21:59 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:54915) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jzdn2-000654-Oo for 39695@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 06:21:58 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 86.246.37.13 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-572-13.w86-246.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.246.37.13]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74463E0003; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:21:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt In-Reply-To: <878sf7pd73.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200220162336.18848-1-mail@ambrevar.xyz> <87d04k4as4.fsf@gnu.org> <871rl0nmss.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <878sf7pd73.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:21:49 +0200 Message-ID: <875zaamv9e.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.61 X-TUID: Ac0LKb0kFflV --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brett Gilio writes: > Pierre Neidhardt writes: > >> Hi Brett! >> >> Brett Gilio writes: >> >>> Whew! Somebody finally got to it! I tried many times to get mono in a >>> better shape for Guix, but failed! :) As there are a considerable number >>> of changes here, would you mind giving a short synopsis of what still >>> needs to be made before we either reroll a revision or get a final >>> draft? >> >> What still needs to be made? Beside fixing the tests, the patch I've >> sent seems to have Mono 5 and 6 working. >> >> Final draft of what? Sorry, I feel that I'm missing some context :) >> >> If your question is about the Mono ecosystem, there is a lot of work >> left to do. We need a bootstrapped msbuild (the build tool for Mono), >> and then ideally we would have a mono-build-system. I can detail this >> if you want to, let me know. >> >> Cheers! > > Sorry, I wrote this email last night when I was rather tired. I meant to > say what work still needs to be done on the patch before we commit it. Nothing essential, the patch can be merged as is, I believe. > If our ultimate goal is to get .NET Core (with .NET 5 approaching to > replace .NET Core and .NET Framework, and eventually Mono as well) we > should maybe invest time into a general .NET build system. I'm not sure. Absolutely. The investment is significant ;) Maybe the first step would be to gather a team of volunteers. This is very low priority for me personally (I don't even know C#). Maybe posting about this on the mailing list and other social media could be a good start. Cheers! =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl8dWT0ACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH9A8gf/XG3ccwnEFPKgtl7c/3DZ6CxLcPO80lbFfNwbWFIxCN7jH3nEbzcr3lXv p3UgAQHVhWEpyb+abvFdE7sf1B9OlX8/QgQK0JtH8L2HQeblxpJkDEoYjeSKCXVt 2EMgvBUCYCcN+tXRsHYOfV8KNdZCwBbxBeWwxMlBXD+Vtw2BVvUdNM9zQB1K34/T zB4rkc2GVt2AZOVZmvtT51xBZ1u8lwGAPON9aDvk3E0Q2BfmRLhDrK1c7nySXPHO sO/Qxtir5JflwBd9/bnOLDro51J0OPkntQh1uarpUgJcSMtWXisH7HbohmpPRB8y 1+vLy2oQcqLe5TJV6LVM39KwW4sMnQ== =KLuw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--