From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id OXvlJxgyNGAQCwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:37:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id kKlwIxgyNGAlPQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:37:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx2.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E85E121C0 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 23:37:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEJpH-00009U-3s for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:37:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEJp8-00008b-NH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:37:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46326) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEJp8-0004RE-Fv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:37:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEJp8-0006sI-EK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44559: Resent-From: Christopher Baines Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44559 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 44559-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44559.161403340426398 (code B ref 44559); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 44559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2021 22:36:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEJoq-0006rh-2c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:36:44 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:45004) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEJon-0006rZ-Jm for 44559@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:36:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:8ac0:b4c7:f5c8:7caa]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9CF7827BC48; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:36:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from capella (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0d22a822; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:36:40 +0000 (UTC) References: <87d00los2d.fsf@cbaines.net> <87lfbkkr6r.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.14; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <87lfbkkr6r.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:36:37 +0000 Message-ID: <875z2jn30q.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44559@debbugs.gnu.org, Mathieu Othacehe , Carl Dong Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.97 Authentication-Results: aspmx2.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx2.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1E85E121C0 X-Spam-Score: -3.97 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: LWIl5Av8RFLS --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Perhaps we could start by testing this hypothesis on a separate build > farm. Chris, Mathieu, WDYT? I'm currently thinking about attempting these kind of things (testing building derivations under different conditions) through the agent tags in the Guix Build Coordinator. I haven't used this functionality yet, but it's mostly implemented. The idea is that agents have tags, that describe various attributes that are important (time=3Dnormal, time=3Dfuture, maybe for example), and builds can also be targeted at specific agents by tagging the builds with those same tags. Where I'm going with this is that I'm not sure a separate build farm is needed, it would be good to just incorperate this in to the build farm used for testing patches and non-master branches. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmA0MfVfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XfzTA//dDib81Fosmi7ryPzjls5juWaCuIeyDrF Kmr62mhR6ekqBSSzIpbMPwKdqXRSfVUAGrnHoYrUSmOa4svQzmA/e9pS0qH9dLrT AOVBDQTROTSIjHHZe4m0aYHvhug8lMxxAzV7hjgh+A5QRtAnuY+BMvmjohyqSMGh sVizxlurSywEo5z9t4wgmMex6u4jwKL5AUwEJSrDOpdQjGHhjoDsCdPJNsKQ2pn6 U48D1A9nDbo99wQwHK/iOY6iB8H+pMEsJsQ0YCsprAfOZeywVT5xqFcOJJLPjGv6 CwQrKGUiDsFkclwMfNK14jbpAsqY5H3YbrcyuouLqjCT6bafVzxkyK1s8Rp4X+Ex ehZLH2kcKpxNENAHZ3drKuigY/CnBxtwTQTCmktKFhkX+mklyFVbqYbEktEl+X71 P1MtrNPV0Ogg0ByuR0UHduMa8llNM5Utl+70jsCkgtjRLHFlMokolpbuqGOvQF81 BVUGGs32jjBEJhC0X04Keo1Wib/HioypvAQquPkWnV7VlQW5NkqTnoXMqzH37tXY WrmPbeaCcjeDk/NUl/+9QtZmIVdqQ0SINxo8Equ3do5UGM3gqR9uxhaopLcvPyDE FL+70wfmokLkodJQlZeITIWdo1YRURzGF8VXKNi+xvr+i3zoSJPe9+68w79qVZw6 /I5KlhXdU2E= =IyUw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--