From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id mCUMCQ/cVGG9AgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 23:35:11 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 4BqSBA/cVGHteAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 21:35:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AEC4344C5 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 23:35:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59614 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVhEL-0004WG-6v for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:35:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVhED-0004Vp-Vj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:35:01 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVhED-0005aj-Ns for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:35:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mVhED-0007sx-IC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:35:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#50620] [PATCH 0/2] Unify 'computed-origin-method' (linux, icecat) Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 21:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50620 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Mark H Weaver Cc: Liliana Marie Prikler , 50620@debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun Received: via spool by 50620-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50620.163295126530261 (code B ref 50620); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 21:35:01 +0000 Received: (at 50620) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2021 21:34:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50509 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mVhDd-0007s1-Eo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:34:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32898) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mVhDc-0007ro-FO for 50620@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:34:24 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVhDW-00051n-Hk; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:34:18 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=36426 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVhDW-0002cR-9E; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:34:18 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20210916114734.2686426-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> <9b6ee27ff10e1042a5d61d0f93d957cf760e9ecb.camel@gmail.com> <87v930ay5y.fsf@netris.org> <87pmstghx0.fsf@netris.org> <87a6jv8qu7.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87h7e3glkn.fsf@netris.org> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 23:34:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h7e3glkn.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:42:21 -0400") Message-ID: <875yuj6p7r.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1632951310; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=/pedNMKgTURukdbqRsswhq4FuIALj0+ilElX7gsm+ec=; b=offN45shOGZH3qtqUcNAOLVpnXh+cEXqqBC0YNJHmR4gqJ8knGWfhSrdZvq3+ubS3zW2Py U95kiiGV/B6eS6QtQuzcU+ebmGVCGbahw88KY5g134o73tBsj5xVZrLhQthoTM567lhb4u CzP5RbZhPTnhbZLB5/WTDx2FQmtSk8NsZMSej+Z0Hkl9H+eacoLDJvq+TtTayKjVr/7eXV Gdvs2ok3b5J/mSRKprWUPitH6MQbr+lKjgQIvqnBWqjcFL/UN3yJEqXFOh5GbnJOZiUJbv ORUJMTz2oLkSkc7TyB7CrDdl9GI/d9EqZ91GgVlxWrnXyz0XUmGSwj9ENuxJzQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1632951310; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=a/px7ey54V/dUSxbUHdtbfapoKIM5tfu85gs8HHlu81BmysWbu9PYbBvPRLr7XqQcEhdjq 1Enx78PoggytwYGncD5mLEETgKQx+dB7Qjr1Eyf7pc8QOFFvnBuqSjBdEuLIeB5evFa/zH tZjgOelXYq2+uBvyVSJHQIf/r6n8TL1USSJjYWPknA1p+RxxNNyv634TZ7+rqcEJW+x/DK ydSv4gsetXmShwXUw5VLHIxnwp9VgDXOLOF8iX/mnVqvzV4b8IKYkTM8R1fJBxdWk76jDd FhsyyG8vpqP2Fz6iNTEWkZL0RJqR50NM+pJaXBikVUZIxEWtqPxkbNn6/qKhbQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.40 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0AEC4344C5 X-Spam-Score: -1.40 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: MupFqoH9c0vV Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> A better solution IMO would be to improve the =E2=80=98snippet=E2=80=99 = mechanism in the >> first place. =E2=80=98computed-origin-method=E2=80=99 improves on it in= two ways: (1) >> lazy evaluation of the gexp, and (2) allows the use of a different base >> name. >> >> I would think #2 is addressed by the =E2=80=98file-name=E2=80=99 field (= isn=E2=80=99t it?). > > Using the 'file-name' field would not satisfy my requirements. It has > two problems: > > (1) It would cause the unmodified upstream Firefox source tarball to be > named "icecat-=E2=80=A6" in the store. > > (2) Although the resulting tarball would be named "icecat-=E2=80=A6", the > toplevel directory name within that tarball would still be named > "firefox-=E2=80=A6". > > I consider each of these flaws to be unacceptable. Oh I see. I agree it=E2=80=99d be nice to have a way to fix those. Perhaps by allowing for custom pack-and-repack procedures? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.